BibTex RIS Cite

TECHNOLOGY INTELLIGENCE PROCESS IN TECHNOPARK FIRMS: AN EMPIRICAL RESEARCH IN TURKEY

Year 2016, Volume: 8 Issue: 1, 74 - 100, 01.06.2016

Ali Kılıc Tanyel Cakmak Hakan Eren Fahri Sakarya

Abstract

The new age is characterized by a knowledge based economy and rapid
technological changes. In this complex environment, technology intelligence (TI) and forecasting the future technologies are important for being proactive against the rapid technological changes and generating new innovations. TI is a vital process to sustain the firm`s competitiveness. This paper examines the technology intelligence process in scope of Turkish technopark firms. The empirical data was obtained from 136 technopark firms and evaluated by the context of TI model synthesized by the researchers based on the literature. According to the results it is determined that, TI mechanisms of the technopark firms are unstructured and technopark firm’s don’t allocate enough resources for TI, they use the environments that can be easily reached such as internet and periodical magazines, and analyze the data about technology by using heuristic methods mostly. This could be related to characteristics of the technopark firms such as being micro size and owner-manager, insufficient personnel and financial sources etc. Because in developing countries like Turkey most of the firms are SMEs, a further research might be useful to develop a specialized TI model for SMEs

Keywords

Technology Intelligence Technology Watch Technology Scanning

References

  • Aguilar, F.J.( 1967), Scanning Business Environment, The Macmillan Co. Publishing, New York,.
  • Almeida, A., C. Santos and M. Rui-Silva (2008), Bridging Science to Economy:
  • The Role of Science and Technologic Parks in Innovation Strategies in “Follower” Regions, FEP Working Papers N.302, Faculdade de Economia, Universidade Do Porto Arman, H. and Foden J, (2010), “Combining Methods in the Technology
  • Intelligence Process: Application in an Aerospace Manufacturing Firm”, R&D Management, 40, pp.181-193. Ashton, W.B., Kinzey, B.R. and Gunn, M.E.,( 1991) “A Structural Approach for
  • Monitoring Science And Technology Developments”, International Journal of Technology Management, 6, pp. 91–111. Ashton, W.B. and Klavans, R.A. (1997), Keeping Abreast of Science and Technology: Technical Intelligence in Business, Batelle Press, Columbus, OH.
  • Ashton, W.B. and Stacey, G.S. (1995) “Technical Intelligence in Business:
  • Understanding Technology Threats and Opportunities”, International Journal of Technology Management, 10, pp.79-104. Brin, S.,and Page, L. (1998) “The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web
  • Search Engine,” Computer Network and ISDN Systems (30), pp. 107-117. Brockley, E. M., (2004.), Emerging Technology Intelligence: Scanning and Monitoring for Strategic Planning, MIT Sloan School of Management.
  • Bucher, P., Birkenmeier, B., Brodbeck, H., Ecsher, J.P., (2003), “Management
  • Principles for Evaluating and Introducing Disruptive Technologies: The Case of Nanotechnology in Switzerland”, R&D Management 33, 2, pp. 149-163. Chan, K.Y.A., L.A.G. Oerlemansand M.W. Pretorius (2010), “Knowledge Flows and Innovative Performances of NTBFs in Gauteng, South Africa: An Attempt to
  • Explain Mixed Findings in Science Park Research”, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 66, pp. 138-152. Cetindamar, D., Phaal, R., Probert, D. (2010), Technology Management Activities and Tools, Palgrave Publishment, New York.
  • Chesbrough, H. (2003), “The Era of Open Innovation”, MIT Sloan Management Review, 44, pp.25-41.
  • Christensen, C.M., (1997) The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies
  • Cause Great Firms to Fail, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Massachusetts. Cohen, W.H. and Levinthal, D.A. (1990) “Absorptive Capacity: A New
  • Perspective on Learning and Innovation”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, pp.128-152. Cooper A. C, Schendel D. (1976) “Strategic Responses to Technological Threats”,
  • Business Horizons, Vol: 16, pp. 61-69. Edler J., Krahmer F. M, Reger, Guido, (2002)“Changes in the Strategic
  • Management of Technology: Results of a Global Benchmarking Study”, R&D Management, 32, 2, Blackwell Publishing, pp. 149-164. Etzkowitz, H. ve L. Leydesdorff., (2000)“The Dynamics of Innovation: from
  • National Systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a Triple Helix of University-Industry Government Relations”, Research Policy, 29, pp. 109-123. Fleisher, C.S., (2006), “Assessing the Tools Companies Use or Analyzing the S&T Environment”, International Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning, 2, pp.380-403.
  • Gerybadze, A. (1994), “Technology Forecasting as a Process of Organizational
  • Intelligence” R&D Management, 24(2), pp. 131-140. Iansiti, M. (2000), “How the Incumbent can Win: Managing Technological
  • Transitions in the Semiconductor Industry”, Management Science, 46, 169-185. IASP (2015), The role of STP Sandareas of Innovation, web site: http://www.iasp.ws/web/guest/the-role-of-stps-and-innovation- areas;jsessionid=1bc4cf3ed868406bd837ee0174f4
  • Ikavalko, M., Pihkala, T., Kraus, S. (2010) “The Role of Owner Manager’s
  • Psychological Ownership in SME Strategic Behavior”, Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 23, No: 3 , pp. 461-480. Karasar, N. (2010), Scientific Research Methods, Ankara, Nobel Books..
  • Kerr, C.I.V., Mortara, L., Phaal, R., and Probert, D.R. (2006), “A Conceptual
  • Model for Technology Intelligence”, International Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning, 2, pp.73-93. Kocak, O., Can, O. (2007), Design of Public Support for R&D: A Study of Turkish
  • Technoparks, Sabanci University, 2007.
  • Lichtenthaler, E. (2003) “Third Generation Management of Technology
  • Intelligence Processes”, R&D Management 33, 4, Blackwell Publishing, pp. 361- Lichtenthaler, E., (2004)“Coordination of Technology Intelligence Process: A
  • Study in Technology Intensive Multinationals, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 16, pp.197-221. Lichtenthaler, E. (2005), “The Choice of Technology Intelligence Methods in
  • Multinationals: Towards A Contingency Approach”, International Journal of Technology Management, Vol: 32, Nos. 3/4, pp. 388-407. Lichtenthaler, E. (2006), “Managing Technology Intelligence Processes in
  • Situations of Radical Innovation Change”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, No: 74, pp. 1109-1136.
  • MSIT (2014), Ministry of Science, Industry and Technology, Turkey, http://www.sanayi.gov.tr/Default.aspx?lng=en access date July, 2014.
  • Patton, K.M., (2005)“The Role of Scanning in Open Intelligence Systems”,
  • Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72, pp.1082-1093.
  • Pena, P.H. (2009), The SIM Card: An Exercise of Technology Watch Chasing
  • State of the Art and New Opportunities, Master’s Thesis, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain, 2009.
  • Porter, A.L., Cunningham, S.W., (2005), Tech Mining: Exploiting New
  • Technologies for Competitive Advantage, Wiley & Sons Inc., New Jersey. Porter, A.L., Roper, A.T., Mason, T.W., Rossini, F.A., Banks, J., and Wiederholt, B.J (1991), Forecasting and Management of Technology, Wıley-Interscience, New York, 1991.
  • Ransley, D. L., (2001), “Benchmarking the “External Technology Watching”
  • Process: Chevron’s Experience”, Competitive Technical Intelligence, Wiley and Sons, pp. 286-296. Savioz, P., Luggen M., Tschirky H. (2003), “Technology Intelligence- Structuring
  • It into The New Technology Based Firm (NTBF)”, Tech Monitor, July-August, pp. 41-46. Savioz, P., (2002), Technology Intelligence in Technology-based SMEs:
  • Conceptual Design and Implementation, ETH Zürich, B-327422, Verlag
  • Industrial Organization, 2002.
  • Schilling, M.A. (1998), “Technological Lockout: An Integrative Model of the Economic and Strategic Factors Driving Technology Success and Failure”,
  • Academic Management Review, 23, pp.267-284. Siegel, D.S., P. Westhead and M. Wright (2003), “Science Parks and The Performance of New Technology Based Firms: A Review of Recent UK Evidence and an Agenda for Future Research”, Small Business Economics, 20, 2003, pp. 184.
  • Tschirky, H. (1994), “The Role of Technology Forecasting and Assessment in
  • Technology Management”, R&D Management, 24, pp.121-129. Utterback, J. M., & Brown, J. W. (1972) “Profiles of The Future: Monitoring for
  • Technological Opportunities” Business Horizons, Vol:15, pp. 5-15. Veugelers, M., Bury, J. and Viaene, S. (2010), “Linking Technology Intelligence to Open Innovation”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77, pp.335
  • Wolff, M. (1992), “Scouting for Technology”, Research Technology Management, 35, pp.10-12.

Year 2016, Volume: 8 Issue: 1, 74 - 100, 01.06.2016

Ali Kılıc Tanyel Cakmak Hakan Eren Fahri Sakarya

Abstract

References

  • Aguilar, F.J.( 1967), Scanning Business Environment, The Macmillan Co. Publishing, New York,.
  • Almeida, A., C. Santos and M. Rui-Silva (2008), Bridging Science to Economy:
  • The Role of Science and Technologic Parks in Innovation Strategies in “Follower” Regions, FEP Working Papers N.302, Faculdade de Economia, Universidade Do Porto Arman, H. and Foden J, (2010), “Combining Methods in the Technology
  • Intelligence Process: Application in an Aerospace Manufacturing Firm”, R&D Management, 40, pp.181-193. Ashton, W.B., Kinzey, B.R. and Gunn, M.E.,( 1991) “A Structural Approach for
  • Monitoring Science And Technology Developments”, International Journal of Technology Management, 6, pp. 91–111. Ashton, W.B. and Klavans, R.A. (1997), Keeping Abreast of Science and Technology: Technical Intelligence in Business, Batelle Press, Columbus, OH.
  • Ashton, W.B. and Stacey, G.S. (1995) “Technical Intelligence in Business:
  • Understanding Technology Threats and Opportunities”, International Journal of Technology Management, 10, pp.79-104. Brin, S.,and Page, L. (1998) “The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web
  • Search Engine,” Computer Network and ISDN Systems (30), pp. 107-117. Brockley, E. M., (2004.), Emerging Technology Intelligence: Scanning and Monitoring for Strategic Planning, MIT Sloan School of Management.
  • Bucher, P., Birkenmeier, B., Brodbeck, H., Ecsher, J.P., (2003), “Management
  • Principles for Evaluating and Introducing Disruptive Technologies: The Case of Nanotechnology in Switzerland”, R&D Management 33, 2, pp. 149-163. Chan, K.Y.A., L.A.G. Oerlemansand M.W. Pretorius (2010), “Knowledge Flows and Innovative Performances of NTBFs in Gauteng, South Africa: An Attempt to
  • Explain Mixed Findings in Science Park Research”, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 66, pp. 138-152. Cetindamar, D., Phaal, R., Probert, D. (2010), Technology Management Activities and Tools, Palgrave Publishment, New York.
  • Chesbrough, H. (2003), “The Era of Open Innovation”, MIT Sloan Management Review, 44, pp.25-41.
  • Christensen, C.M., (1997) The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies
  • Cause Great Firms to Fail, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Massachusetts. Cohen, W.H. and Levinthal, D.A. (1990) “Absorptive Capacity: A New
  • Perspective on Learning and Innovation”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, pp.128-152. Cooper A. C, Schendel D. (1976) “Strategic Responses to Technological Threats”,
  • Business Horizons, Vol: 16, pp. 61-69. Edler J., Krahmer F. M, Reger, Guido, (2002)“Changes in the Strategic
  • Management of Technology: Results of a Global Benchmarking Study”, R&D Management, 32, 2, Blackwell Publishing, pp. 149-164. Etzkowitz, H. ve L. Leydesdorff., (2000)“The Dynamics of Innovation: from
  • National Systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a Triple Helix of University-Industry Government Relations”, Research Policy, 29, pp. 109-123. Fleisher, C.S., (2006), “Assessing the Tools Companies Use or Analyzing the S&T Environment”, International Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning, 2, pp.380-403.
  • Gerybadze, A. (1994), “Technology Forecasting as a Process of Organizational
  • Intelligence” R&D Management, 24(2), pp. 131-140. Iansiti, M. (2000), “How the Incumbent can Win: Managing Technological
  • Transitions in the Semiconductor Industry”, Management Science, 46, 169-185. IASP (2015), The role of STP Sandareas of Innovation, web site: http://www.iasp.ws/web/guest/the-role-of-stps-and-innovation- areas;jsessionid=1bc4cf3ed868406bd837ee0174f4
  • Ikavalko, M., Pihkala, T., Kraus, S. (2010) “The Role of Owner Manager’s
  • Psychological Ownership in SME Strategic Behavior”, Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 23, No: 3 , pp. 461-480. Karasar, N. (2010), Scientific Research Methods, Ankara, Nobel Books..
  • Kerr, C.I.V., Mortara, L., Phaal, R., and Probert, D.R. (2006), “A Conceptual
  • Model for Technology Intelligence”, International Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning, 2, pp.73-93. Kocak, O., Can, O. (2007), Design of Public Support for R&D: A Study of Turkish
  • Technoparks, Sabanci University, 2007.
  • Lichtenthaler, E. (2003) “Third Generation Management of Technology
  • Intelligence Processes”, R&D Management 33, 4, Blackwell Publishing, pp. 361- Lichtenthaler, E., (2004)“Coordination of Technology Intelligence Process: A
  • Study in Technology Intensive Multinationals, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 16, pp.197-221. Lichtenthaler, E. (2005), “The Choice of Technology Intelligence Methods in
  • Multinationals: Towards A Contingency Approach”, International Journal of Technology Management, Vol: 32, Nos. 3/4, pp. 388-407. Lichtenthaler, E. (2006), “Managing Technology Intelligence Processes in
  • Situations of Radical Innovation Change”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, No: 74, pp. 1109-1136.
  • MSIT (2014), Ministry of Science, Industry and Technology, Turkey, http://www.sanayi.gov.tr/Default.aspx?lng=en access date July, 2014.
  • Patton, K.M., (2005)“The Role of Scanning in Open Intelligence Systems”,
  • Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72, pp.1082-1093.
  • Pena, P.H. (2009), The SIM Card: An Exercise of Technology Watch Chasing
  • State of the Art and New Opportunities, Master’s Thesis, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain, 2009.
  • Porter, A.L., Cunningham, S.W., (2005), Tech Mining: Exploiting New
  • Technologies for Competitive Advantage, Wiley & Sons Inc., New Jersey. Porter, A.L., Roper, A.T., Mason, T.W., Rossini, F.A., Banks, J., and Wiederholt, B.J (1991), Forecasting and Management of Technology, Wıley-Interscience, New York, 1991.
  • Ransley, D. L., (2001), “Benchmarking the “External Technology Watching”
  • Process: Chevron’s Experience”, Competitive Technical Intelligence, Wiley and Sons, pp. 286-296. Savioz, P., Luggen M., Tschirky H. (2003), “Technology Intelligence- Structuring
  • It into The New Technology Based Firm (NTBF)”, Tech Monitor, July-August, pp. 41-46. Savioz, P., (2002), Technology Intelligence in Technology-based SMEs:
  • Conceptual Design and Implementation, ETH Zürich, B-327422, Verlag
  • Industrial Organization, 2002.
  • Schilling, M.A. (1998), “Technological Lockout: An Integrative Model of the Economic and Strategic Factors Driving Technology Success and Failure”,
  • Academic Management Review, 23, pp.267-284. Siegel, D.S., P. Westhead and M. Wright (2003), “Science Parks and The Performance of New Technology Based Firms: A Review of Recent UK Evidence and an Agenda for Future Research”, Small Business Economics, 20, 2003, pp. 184.
  • Tschirky, H. (1994), “The Role of Technology Forecasting and Assessment in
  • Technology Management”, R&D Management, 24, pp.121-129. Utterback, J. M., & Brown, J. W. (1972) “Profiles of The Future: Monitoring for
  • Technological Opportunities” Business Horizons, Vol:15, pp. 5-15. Veugelers, M., Bury, J. and Viaene, S. (2010), “Linking Technology Intelligence to Open Innovation”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77, pp.335
  • Wolff, M. (1992), “Scouting for Technology”, Research Technology Management, 35, pp.10-12.
There are 49 citations in total.

Details

Other ID JA97KA56GF
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Ali Kılıc

Tanyel Cakmak This is me

Hakan Eren This is me

Fahri Sakarya This is me

Publication Date June 1, 2016
Published in Issue Year 2016 Volume: 8 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Kılıc, A., Cakmak, T., Eren, H., Sakarya, F. (2016). TECHNOLOGY INTELLIGENCE PROCESS IN TECHNOPARK FIRMS: AN EMPIRICAL RESEARCH IN TURKEY. International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies, 8(1), 74-100.
AMA Kılıc A, Cakmak T, Eren H, Sakarya F. TECHNOLOGY INTELLIGENCE PROCESS IN TECHNOPARK FIRMS: AN EMPIRICAL RESEARCH IN TURKEY. IJEFS. June 2016;8(1):74-100.
Chicago Kılıc, Ali, Tanyel Cakmak, Hakan Eren, and Fahri Sakarya. “TECHNOLOGY INTELLIGENCE PROCESS IN TECHNOPARK FIRMS: AN EMPIRICAL RESEARCH IN TURKEY”. International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies 8, no. 1 (June 2016): 74-100.
EndNote Kılıc A, Cakmak T, Eren H, Sakarya F (June 1, 2016) TECHNOLOGY INTELLIGENCE PROCESS IN TECHNOPARK FIRMS: AN EMPIRICAL RESEARCH IN TURKEY. International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies 8 1 74–100.
IEEE A. Kılıc, T. Cakmak, H. Eren, and F. Sakarya, “TECHNOLOGY INTELLIGENCE PROCESS IN TECHNOPARK FIRMS: AN EMPIRICAL RESEARCH IN TURKEY”, IJEFS, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 74–100, 2016.
ISNAD Kılıc, Ali et al. “TECHNOLOGY INTELLIGENCE PROCESS IN TECHNOPARK FIRMS: AN EMPIRICAL RESEARCH IN TURKEY”. International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies 8/1 (June 2016), 74-100.
JAMA Kılıc A, Cakmak T, Eren H, Sakarya F. TECHNOLOGY INTELLIGENCE PROCESS IN TECHNOPARK FIRMS: AN EMPIRICAL RESEARCH IN TURKEY. IJEFS. 2016;8:74–100.
MLA Kılıc, Ali et al. “TECHNOLOGY INTELLIGENCE PROCESS IN TECHNOPARK FIRMS: AN EMPIRICAL RESEARCH IN TURKEY”. International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies, vol. 8, no. 1, 2016, pp. 74-100.
Vancouver Kılıc A, Cakmak T, Eren H, Sakarya F. TECHNOLOGY INTELLIGENCE PROCESS IN TECHNOPARK FIRMS: AN EMPIRICAL RESEARCH IN TURKEY. IJEFS. 2016;8(1):74-100.