Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Resmî aktörler bağlamında dijital kamu diplomasisi

Year 2017, Volume: 3 Issue: 4, 1233 - 1244, 01.10.2017

Serhan Koyuncu Burak Medin

https://doi.org/10.24289/ijsser.309106
Cited By: 2

Abstract










Kamu diplomasisi, içinde bulunulan yüzyılın en önemli
uluslararası enstrümanlarından biridir. Özellikle İkinci Dünya Savaşı’nın
ardından kamu diplomasisine ağırlık verilmeye başlanmıştır. Kamu diplomasisinde
yeni iletişim teknolojileri etkili bir şekilde kullanılmaktadır. Kamu diplomasisi
hem geleneksel medyayı hem elektronik medyayı hem de dijital medyayı kapsamı
içerisine almaktadır. 21. yüzyıl kamu diplomasisinde dijital medyanın hem hızlı
olması hem de karşılıklı iletişime imkân vermesi nedeniyle geleneksel ve
elektronik medyaya göre daha çok tercih edildiği görülmektedir. Türk İşbirliği
ve Koordinasyon Ajansı Başkanlığı (TİKA), Yurtdışı Türkler ve Akraba
Topluluklar Başkanlığı (YTB) ve Kızılay; Türkiye’nin kamu diplomasisi
alanındaki önemli kurum ve kuruluşlarıdır. Bu çalışmada da TİKA, YTB ve Kızılay’ın
Facebook ve Twitter’ı kamu diplomasisi bağlamında nasıl kullandıkları
irdelenmektedir.

Keywords

Kamu diplomasisi dijital medya iletişim

References

  • Bayraktutan, G., Binark, M., Telli Aydemir, A., Çomu, T., Doğu, B. ve İslamoğlu, G. (2012). “Sosyal Medyada 2011 Genel Seçimleri: Nicel-Nitel Ara yüz İncelemesi”. Selçuk İletişim Dergisi, 7 (3): 5-29.
  • Cull, N. J. (2009a). Public Diplomacy Before Gullion (ed. Nancy Snow & Philip M. Taylor). Routledge handbook of public diplomacy. New York: Routledge, s. 19-23. Friedman, T. L. (2007). The world is flat; a brief history of the twenty-first century. Pi-cador.
  • Ifukor, P. (2010). “Elections” or “Selections”? Blogging and Twittering the Nigerian 2007 General Elections. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30(6), 398-414. doi:10.1177/0270467610380008.
  • Kanat, S. (2016). Uluslararası İlişkiler Yaklaşımları Açısından Dijital Medya ve Savaş. TRT Akademi. Cilt 01, Sayı 02.
  • Keohane, R. O. & Nye, J. S. (1998). Power and Interdependence in the Information Age. Foreign affairs. Vol. 77, s. 81-94.
  • Kim, W. ve ark., (2010). On Social Web Sites. Information Systems, 35/2, Elsevier.
  • Meikle, G. (2016). Social Media: Communication, Sharing and Visibility. London: Routledge.
  • Nye, J. S. (1990). Bound to lead: The changing nature of American power. Basic Bo-oks.
  • Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft Power The Means to Success In World Politics. New York: Pub-lic Affairs.
  • Nye, J. S. (2005). Dünya siyasetinde başarının yolu - yumuşak güç. Ankara: Elips Ya-yınları.
  • Nye, J. S. (2008). Public Diplomacy and Soft Power, Public Diplomacy in a Changing World (ed. Geoffrey Cowan, Nicholas J. Cull). The annals of the American academy of political and social science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Volume 616, Sage Publications, s. 94-109.
  • Nye, J. S. (2010). Responding to my Critics and Concluding Thoughts, Soft Power and US Foreign Policy. Soft power and US foreign policy. Theoretical, historical and contem-porary perspectives. (ed. Inderjeet Parmar & Michael Cox). Routledge.
  • O’Reilly, T. (2007). What is Web 2.0: design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Communication & Strategies, 65, 1st Quarter.
  • Potter, E. (2002). Canada and the New Public Diplomacy. Netherlands Institute of In-ternational Relations.
  • Qualman E (2009) Statistics Show Social Media Is Bigger Than You Think , http://www. socialnomics.net/2009/08/11/statistics-showsocial-media-is-bigger-than-you-think/.
  • Sagolla, D. (2009). “How Twitter Was Born”. http://www.140characters.com/2009/01/30/how-twitter-was-born/.
  • Selwyn, N. (2007). Web 2.0 applications as alternative environments for informal learning - a critical review. CERI-KERIS International Expert Meeting on ICT and Educa-tional Performance, Cheju National University, South Korea.
  • Snow, N. (2009). Rethinking Public Diplomacy. Routledge Handbook of Public Dip-lomacy. New York: Taylor&Francis.
  • Sütçü, C. S. (2012). Sosyal Medyaya Girmeden Önce Bilinmesi Gerekenler. (ed. Deniz Yengin). Yeni medya ve. İstanbul: Anahtar Kitaplar Yayınevi.
  • Şendağ, S. (2008). Web’de Yeni Eğilimler: Öğrenme Ortamlarına Entegrasyonu. Pro-ceedings of 8th International Educational Technology, 995-1001, Anadolu Üniversitesi, Eskişehir.
  • Taylor, P. M. (1997). Global Communications, International Affairs and The Media Since 1945. London: Routledge.
  • Toprak, A. vd., (2009). Toplumsal Paylaşım Ağı Facebook: “Görülüyorum Öyleyse Varım!” İstanbul: Kalkedon.
  • Winston, B. (2003). Media, technology and society. New York: Routledge Publishing.
  • www.kizilay.org.tr.
  • www.tika.gov.tr.
  • www.ytb.gov.tr.

Digital public diplomacy in the context of official actors

Year 2017, Volume: 3 Issue: 4, 1233 - 1244, 01.10.2017

Serhan Koyuncu Burak Medin

https://doi.org/10.24289/ijsser.309106
Cited By: 2

Abstract










The public diplomacy is one of the most important
international instruments. Especially after the Second World War, public
diplomacy began to be emphasized. New communication technologies in public
diplomacy are being used effectively. Public diplomacy involves both
traditional media, electronic media, and digital media. It is seen that digital
media in the public diplomacy of the 21st century is preferred both by
traditional and electronic media because it allows both rapid and mutual communication.
TIKA, YTB and Kızılay; Turkey's public diplomacy in the field of important
institutions and organizations. This study also examines how TİKA, YTB and Kızılay
use Facebook and Twitter in the context of public diplomacy.

Keywords

Public diplomacy digital media communication

References

  • Bayraktutan, G., Binark, M., Telli Aydemir, A., Çomu, T., Doğu, B. ve İslamoğlu, G. (2012). “Sosyal Medyada 2011 Genel Seçimleri: Nicel-Nitel Ara yüz İncelemesi”. Selçuk İletişim Dergisi, 7 (3): 5-29.
  • Cull, N. J. (2009a). Public Diplomacy Before Gullion (ed. Nancy Snow & Philip M. Taylor). Routledge handbook of public diplomacy. New York: Routledge, s. 19-23. Friedman, T. L. (2007). The world is flat; a brief history of the twenty-first century. Pi-cador.
  • Ifukor, P. (2010). “Elections” or “Selections”? Blogging and Twittering the Nigerian 2007 General Elections. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30(6), 398-414. doi:10.1177/0270467610380008.
  • Kanat, S. (2016). Uluslararası İlişkiler Yaklaşımları Açısından Dijital Medya ve Savaş. TRT Akademi. Cilt 01, Sayı 02.
  • Keohane, R. O. & Nye, J. S. (1998). Power and Interdependence in the Information Age. Foreign affairs. Vol. 77, s. 81-94.
  • Kim, W. ve ark., (2010). On Social Web Sites. Information Systems, 35/2, Elsevier.
  • Meikle, G. (2016). Social Media: Communication, Sharing and Visibility. London: Routledge.
  • Nye, J. S. (1990). Bound to lead: The changing nature of American power. Basic Bo-oks.
  • Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft Power The Means to Success In World Politics. New York: Pub-lic Affairs.
  • Nye, J. S. (2005). Dünya siyasetinde başarının yolu - yumuşak güç. Ankara: Elips Ya-yınları.
  • Nye, J. S. (2008). Public Diplomacy and Soft Power, Public Diplomacy in a Changing World (ed. Geoffrey Cowan, Nicholas J. Cull). The annals of the American academy of political and social science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Volume 616, Sage Publications, s. 94-109.
  • Nye, J. S. (2010). Responding to my Critics and Concluding Thoughts, Soft Power and US Foreign Policy. Soft power and US foreign policy. Theoretical, historical and contem-porary perspectives. (ed. Inderjeet Parmar & Michael Cox). Routledge.
  • O’Reilly, T. (2007). What is Web 2.0: design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Communication & Strategies, 65, 1st Quarter.
  • Potter, E. (2002). Canada and the New Public Diplomacy. Netherlands Institute of In-ternational Relations.
  • Qualman E (2009) Statistics Show Social Media Is Bigger Than You Think , http://www. socialnomics.net/2009/08/11/statistics-showsocial-media-is-bigger-than-you-think/.
  • Sagolla, D. (2009). “How Twitter Was Born”. http://www.140characters.com/2009/01/30/how-twitter-was-born/.
  • Selwyn, N. (2007). Web 2.0 applications as alternative environments for informal learning - a critical review. CERI-KERIS International Expert Meeting on ICT and Educa-tional Performance, Cheju National University, South Korea.
  • Snow, N. (2009). Rethinking Public Diplomacy. Routledge Handbook of Public Dip-lomacy. New York: Taylor&Francis.
  • Sütçü, C. S. (2012). Sosyal Medyaya Girmeden Önce Bilinmesi Gerekenler. (ed. Deniz Yengin). Yeni medya ve. İstanbul: Anahtar Kitaplar Yayınevi.
  • Şendağ, S. (2008). Web’de Yeni Eğilimler: Öğrenme Ortamlarına Entegrasyonu. Pro-ceedings of 8th International Educational Technology, 995-1001, Anadolu Üniversitesi, Eskişehir.
  • Taylor, P. M. (1997). Global Communications, International Affairs and The Media Since 1945. London: Routledge.
  • Toprak, A. vd., (2009). Toplumsal Paylaşım Ağı Facebook: “Görülüyorum Öyleyse Varım!” İstanbul: Kalkedon.
  • Winston, B. (2003). Media, technology and society. New York: Routledge Publishing.
  • www.kizilay.org.tr.
  • www.tika.gov.tr.
  • www.ytb.gov.tr.
There are 26 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Serhan Koyuncu This is me

Burak Medin

Publication Date October 1, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2017 Volume: 3 Issue: 4

Cite

APA Koyuncu, S., & Medin, B. (2017). Digital public diplomacy in the context of official actors. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, 3(4), 1233-1244. https://doi.org/10.24289/ijsser.309106
AMA Koyuncu S, Medin B. Digital public diplomacy in the context of official actors. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research. October 2017;3(4):1233-1244. doi:10.24289/ijsser.309106
Chicago Koyuncu, Serhan, and Burak Medin. “Digital Public Diplomacy in the Context of Official Actors”. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research 3, no. 4 (October 2017): 1233-44. https://doi.org/10.24289/ijsser.309106.
EndNote Koyuncu S, Medin B (October 1, 2017) Digital public diplomacy in the context of official actors. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research 3 4 1233–1244.
IEEE S. Koyuncu and B. Medin, “Digital public diplomacy in the context of official actors”, International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 1233–1244, 2017, doi: 10.24289/ijsser.309106.
ISNAD Koyuncu, Serhan - Medin, Burak. “Digital Public Diplomacy in the Context of Official Actors”. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research 3/4 (October 2017), 1233-1244. https://doi.org/10.24289/ijsser.309106.
JAMA Koyuncu S, Medin B. Digital public diplomacy in the context of official actors. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research. 2017;3:1233–1244.
MLA Koyuncu, Serhan and Burak Medin. “Digital Public Diplomacy in the Context of Official Actors”. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, vol. 3, no. 4, 2017, pp. 1233-44, doi:10.24289/ijsser.309106.
Vancouver Koyuncu S, Medin B. Digital public diplomacy in the context of official actors. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research. 2017;3(4):1233-44.

Cited By

Pandemide Türkiye’nin Dijital Diplomasi ve Dijital Halkla İlişkiler Örnekleri: www.covid19turkey.com ve www.turkiyestopscovid.com
İletişim Kuram ve Araştırma Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.47998/ikad.1228989
Türk Dünyasına Yönelik Olarak TRT Avaz'da Yayınlanan Haberlerin Kamu Diplomasisi Bağlamında Analizi
SELÇUK ÜNİVERSİTESİ İLETİŞİM FAKÜLTESİ AKADEMİK DERGİSİ
https://doi.org/10.18094/josc.1104534

88x31.png
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.