Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Particulars and Universals in Aristotelian Substance Theory

Year 2021, Issue: 55, 35 - 48, 31.12.2021
https://doi.org/10.26650/arcp.1012750

Abstract

There has been contemporary disagreement about Aristotle`s substance theory. This disagreement has mainly focused on the problem of whether Aristotelian forms are particular or universal. According to the majority of the criteria which are stipulated by Aristotle in Metaphysics Zeta, forms are substances. However, Aristotle also explicitly outlines in the Zeta, and especially in chapters 13 and 16, that no universal can be a substance. At these points in his work, Aristotle should have been clearer regarding whether forms are universals or particulars. In terms of the conclusion of Chapter 13 of Zeta, as well as some other criteria, one may conclude that, if the substance is form, then it should be particular. There are many instances, however, where Aristotle says that since universals are knowable, particulars cannot be known. It seems that if substances are particulars, it is hard to see how they can be knowable. Furthermore, if they are universal, it is hard to say whether particular forms are substances. Since Aristotle never mentioned whether forms could be both universal and particular, this causes difficulties. To examine this problem in more depth, I will not only analyse some textual evidence which is often used to justify the view that forms are universal, but also some textual evidence which is used to justify the view that forms are particular. In so doing, I will also identify some possible solutions regarding the problem of the status of forms in Aristotle`s substance theory. Lastly, I will suggest that individual forms are substances because they are instances of universals and, hence, may be knowable. I will support my view by employing the neo-Aristotelian substance theory posited by Jonathan Lowe; namely, the “Four-Category Ontology.” .

References

  • Aristotle. Metaphysics. Translated by David Bostock. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.
  • Aristotle. Metaphysics. Translated by Ross D.W. N.C.: Alex Catalogue, 2000.
  • Aristotle. Categories, and De Interpretatione. Translated by Ackrill J.L. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1963.
  • Cohen, S. Marc. "Individual and Essence in Aristotle`s Metaphysics". Paideia: Special Aristotle Edition. (1978): 75-85.
  • Galluzzo, Gabriele. "Aquinas’s Interpretation of Aristotle’s Metaphysics, Book Z." Recherches de Theologie et Philosophie Medievales: Vol.74(2). (2007): 423-481.
  • Halper, Edward, C. "Aristotle’s Solution of the Problem of Sensible Substance". Journal of Philosophy: XXXIV. (1987): 666-672.
  • Heinaman, R. "Knowledge Of Substance In Aristotle". The Journal of Hellenic Studies: 101. (1981): 63-77.
  • Lowe, E.J. "Form without Matter" Ratio: 11 (3). (1998): 214-234.
  • Lowe, E.J. The Four-Category Ontology. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 2006.
  • Owen, G.E.L. "Inherence" Phronesis: 10(1). (1965): 97-105.
  • Owen, G.E.L. "Particular and General". Proceeding of the Aristotelian Society. 79, (1978): 1-21.
  • Wallace, E. Aristotle's Psychology. Cambridge: The University Press. 1882
  • Wedin, Michael V. Aristotle's Theory Of Substance. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2000.

Aristoteles Töz Öğretisinde Tekil ve Tümel

Year 2021, Issue: 55, 35 - 48, 31.12.2021
https://doi.org/10.26650/arcp.1012750

Abstract

Aristoteles’in töz anlayışı güncel bir anlaşmazlığa sebep olmaktadır. Bu anlaşmazlık temel olarak Aristoteles tözlerinin tekil mi yoksa tümel mi olduğu problemine dayanmaktadır. Aristoteles’in Metafizik Zeta’da ortaya koyduğu ölçütlerin çoğuna göre form töz olarak tanımlanır. Öte yandan Aristoteles, Zeta ve özellikle 13. ve 16. bölümlerde hiçbir tümelin töz olamayacağını açıkça belirtir. Zeta boyunca Aristoteles’in formun tekil mi yoksa tümel mi olduğu konusunda açık olmadığı da analiz edilebilir. Metafizik Zeta’nın on üçüncü bölümünden çıkarılacak sonuç gereğince eğer form töz ise onun aynı zamanda bireysel olması beklenmektedir. Ancak, Aristoteles’in öğretisinde tümeller bilinebilir olarak tanımlandıkları için tekillerin bilinemeyeceğini söylediği birçok örnek vardır. Bu bakımdan töz bir yandan tekil ise, tözlerin bilinebilirliği konusunda ciddi problemler ortaya çıkmaktadır. Bu problemler özetle Aristoteles’in formun hem tümel hem de tikel olabileceğini açıkça belirtmemesinden de kaynaklanmaktadır. Problemi daha net analiz edebilmek üzere bu çalışma Aristoteles metinlerinde formların dolayısıyla tözün tikel ve tümel olduğunun vurgulandığı pasajları incelemeyi, ve tekil şeylerin tümellerin birer örnekleri olarak hem töz olabileceği hem de bilinebilir şeyler olabileceklerini ileri sürmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu iddia Jonathan Lowe tarafından ortaya atılan Dört-Kategori Ontoloji isimli çalışma ile desteklenecektir.

References

  • Aristotle. Metaphysics. Translated by David Bostock. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.
  • Aristotle. Metaphysics. Translated by Ross D.W. N.C.: Alex Catalogue, 2000.
  • Aristotle. Categories, and De Interpretatione. Translated by Ackrill J.L. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1963.
  • Cohen, S. Marc. "Individual and Essence in Aristotle`s Metaphysics". Paideia: Special Aristotle Edition. (1978): 75-85.
  • Galluzzo, Gabriele. "Aquinas’s Interpretation of Aristotle’s Metaphysics, Book Z." Recherches de Theologie et Philosophie Medievales: Vol.74(2). (2007): 423-481.
  • Halper, Edward, C. "Aristotle’s Solution of the Problem of Sensible Substance". Journal of Philosophy: XXXIV. (1987): 666-672.
  • Heinaman, R. "Knowledge Of Substance In Aristotle". The Journal of Hellenic Studies: 101. (1981): 63-77.
  • Lowe, E.J. "Form without Matter" Ratio: 11 (3). (1998): 214-234.
  • Lowe, E.J. The Four-Category Ontology. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 2006.
  • Owen, G.E.L. "Inherence" Phronesis: 10(1). (1965): 97-105.
  • Owen, G.E.L. "Particular and General". Proceeding of the Aristotelian Society. 79, (1978): 1-21.
  • Wallace, E. Aristotle's Psychology. Cambridge: The University Press. 1882
  • Wedin, Michael V. Aristotle's Theory Of Substance. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2000.
There are 13 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Philosophy
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Erman Kar 0000-0002-6013-7805

Publication Date December 31, 2021
Published in Issue Year 2021 Issue: 55

Cite

Chicago Kar, Erman. “Particulars and Universals in Aristotelian Substance Theory”. Felsefe Arkivi, no. 55 (December 2021): 35-48. https://doi.org/10.26650/arcp.1012750.