Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye Arasında Bir Kamu Diplomasisi Uygulaması Olarak Sivil Toplum Diyaloğu Programı’nın Değerlendirilmesi

Year 2017, Volume: 7 Issue: 13, 912 - 926, 29.12.2017
https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.348548

Abstract

Avrupa Birliği kamu diplomasisi
uygulamaları ile Birlik içi ve Birlik dışında etkileşimi teşvik etmektedir.
Avrupa Birliği-Türkiye ilişkileri çerçevesinde Türkiye’ye yönelik çeşitli kamu
diplomasisi uygulamaları yürüten Avrupa Birliği, Sivil Toplum Diyaloğu
Programı’nı demokrasi ve müktesebat temelli yürütmektedir. Bu makale Avrupa
Birliği açısından önemli bir kamu diplomasisi uygulaması olan Sivil Toplum Diyaloğu
Programı’nı değerlendirmekte  ve
uygulamanın Türkiye’nin değişim ve dönüşümü için nasıl faaliyet gösterdiği ve
neleri amaçladığı üzerinde durmaktadır.

References

  • Akçadağ, E. ( 2012). AB’nin Kamu Diplomasisi ve Türkiye’ye Yansımaları. Özkan, A. and Öztürk, T. E. (Ed.). Kamu Diplomasisi. (pp.229-248). İstanbul: Tasam Yayınları.
  • Aydemir, E. (2016). Dış Politikada Yumuşak Güç ve Medya. İstanbul: Kalkedon Yayınları.
  • Ba, A. (2011). Public Diplomacy and Civil Society. Özev, M. H. (Ed.). Public Diplomacy in the Oic Countries. (pp.43-46). İstanbul: Tasam.
  • Cross, M K. D. and Melissen, J. (Ed.) 2013. European Public Diplomacy Soft Power at Work. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Cull, N. J. (2009). Public Diplomacy: Lessons from the Past. Los Angeles: Figuerroa Press.
  • Duke, S. (2013). The European External Action Service and Public Diplomacy. Clingendael Netherlands Institute of International Relati-ons. European Comission, Public Diplomacy.
  • http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/fpi/documents/20160620fpi_publicdiplomacy_infographic_web.pdf (Access date:02.09.2017).
  • http://fletcher.tufts.edu/Murrow/Diplomacy (Access date: 06.02.2014).
  • http://fletcher.tufts.edu/Murrow/Diplomacy/Definitions (Access date: 07.02.2014).
  • http://www.ab.gov.tr/48092.html (Access date: 02.09.2017).
  • http://www.ab.gov.tr/45649_en.html (Access date: 07.05.2017).
  • http://civilsocietydialogue.org/us/ (Access date: 07.05.2017).
  • http://www.ab.gov.tr/p.php?e=46008 (Access date: 07.05.2017).
  • http://siviltoplumdiyalogu.org/diyalog-seminerleri/ (Access date: 07.05.2017).
  • http://siviltoplumdiyalogu.org/us/ (Access date: 07.05.2017).
  • http://siviltoplumdiyalogu.org/project/akdeniz-diyalog-koprusu/ (Ac-cess date: 07.08.2017).
  • Kaçar, B. (2003). Türkiye-AB Gümrük Birliği. Erdem, M. Ş. and Aykın, S. M. (Ed.) Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye. (pp.389-425). Bursa: Ezgi Kitabevi.
  • Manners, I. and Whitman, R. (2013). Normative Power and the Future of EU Public Diplomacy. Cross, M. K. D. and Melissen, J. (Ed.) European Public Diplomacy Soft Power at Work. (pp.183-203). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Melissen, J. (2005). The New Public Diplomacy: Between Theory and Practice. Melissen, J. (Ed.) The New Public Diplomacy Soft Power in International Relations. (pp.3-27). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
  • Oktay, A. (2004). Türkiye’nin Avrupa Birliği Girişimleri: Eurolaşma (Euroizasyon) Fenomeninin Sonuçları. Kalaycı, İ. (Ed.). Avrupa Birliği Dersleri. (pp.97-119). Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi.
  • Rasmussen, S. B. (2016). Current Challenges to European Union Public Diplomacy. Public Diplomacy Magazine, http://publicdiplomacy magazine.com/current-challenges-to-european-union-public-diplomacy/ (Access date: 30.06.2016).
  • Rugh, W. A. (2004). Engaging the Arabs and Islamic Worlds Through Public Diplomacy. Washington: The Public Diplomacy Council.
  • Seib, P. (2009). Public Diplomacy and Journalism: Parallels, Ethical Issues, and Practical Concerns”, American Behavioral Scientist, Vol: 52, No: 5,772-786.
  • Szondi, G. (2008). Public Diplomacy and Nation Branding: Conseptual Similarities and Differences. Discussion Papers in Diplomacy, Net-herlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’, No:11.
  • Tecer, M. (2007). Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye. Ankara: TODAİE.
  • Tuch, H. N. (1990). Communicating With the World: U.S. Public Diplomacy Overseas. New York: St.Martin’s Press.

Assessment of the Civil Society Dialogue Program between European Union and Turkey as a Public Diplomacy Implementation

Year 2017, Volume: 7 Issue: 13, 912 - 926, 29.12.2017
https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.348548

Abstract

The European Union promotes the internal
and external interaction of the Union with the help of its public diplomacy
implementations. The European Union, which has carried out various public
diplomacy implementations towards Turkey within the framework of European
Union-Turkey relationships, runs the Civil Society Dialogue Program based on
democracy and acquis. This article evaluates the Civil Society Dialogue
Program, an important public diplomacy implementation for the European Union
and it focuses on how the implementation operates and what it aims for Turkey’s
change and transformation.

References

  • Akçadağ, E. ( 2012). AB’nin Kamu Diplomasisi ve Türkiye’ye Yansımaları. Özkan, A. and Öztürk, T. E. (Ed.). Kamu Diplomasisi. (pp.229-248). İstanbul: Tasam Yayınları.
  • Aydemir, E. (2016). Dış Politikada Yumuşak Güç ve Medya. İstanbul: Kalkedon Yayınları.
  • Ba, A. (2011). Public Diplomacy and Civil Society. Özev, M. H. (Ed.). Public Diplomacy in the Oic Countries. (pp.43-46). İstanbul: Tasam.
  • Cross, M K. D. and Melissen, J. (Ed.) 2013. European Public Diplomacy Soft Power at Work. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Cull, N. J. (2009). Public Diplomacy: Lessons from the Past. Los Angeles: Figuerroa Press.
  • Duke, S. (2013). The European External Action Service and Public Diplomacy. Clingendael Netherlands Institute of International Relati-ons. European Comission, Public Diplomacy.
  • http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/fpi/documents/20160620fpi_publicdiplomacy_infographic_web.pdf (Access date:02.09.2017).
  • http://fletcher.tufts.edu/Murrow/Diplomacy (Access date: 06.02.2014).
  • http://fletcher.tufts.edu/Murrow/Diplomacy/Definitions (Access date: 07.02.2014).
  • http://www.ab.gov.tr/48092.html (Access date: 02.09.2017).
  • http://www.ab.gov.tr/45649_en.html (Access date: 07.05.2017).
  • http://civilsocietydialogue.org/us/ (Access date: 07.05.2017).
  • http://www.ab.gov.tr/p.php?e=46008 (Access date: 07.05.2017).
  • http://siviltoplumdiyalogu.org/diyalog-seminerleri/ (Access date: 07.05.2017).
  • http://siviltoplumdiyalogu.org/us/ (Access date: 07.05.2017).
  • http://siviltoplumdiyalogu.org/project/akdeniz-diyalog-koprusu/ (Ac-cess date: 07.08.2017).
  • Kaçar, B. (2003). Türkiye-AB Gümrük Birliği. Erdem, M. Ş. and Aykın, S. M. (Ed.) Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye. (pp.389-425). Bursa: Ezgi Kitabevi.
  • Manners, I. and Whitman, R. (2013). Normative Power and the Future of EU Public Diplomacy. Cross, M. K. D. and Melissen, J. (Ed.) European Public Diplomacy Soft Power at Work. (pp.183-203). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Melissen, J. (2005). The New Public Diplomacy: Between Theory and Practice. Melissen, J. (Ed.) The New Public Diplomacy Soft Power in International Relations. (pp.3-27). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
  • Oktay, A. (2004). Türkiye’nin Avrupa Birliği Girişimleri: Eurolaşma (Euroizasyon) Fenomeninin Sonuçları. Kalaycı, İ. (Ed.). Avrupa Birliği Dersleri. (pp.97-119). Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi.
  • Rasmussen, S. B. (2016). Current Challenges to European Union Public Diplomacy. Public Diplomacy Magazine, http://publicdiplomacy magazine.com/current-challenges-to-european-union-public-diplomacy/ (Access date: 30.06.2016).
  • Rugh, W. A. (2004). Engaging the Arabs and Islamic Worlds Through Public Diplomacy. Washington: The Public Diplomacy Council.
  • Seib, P. (2009). Public Diplomacy and Journalism: Parallels, Ethical Issues, and Practical Concerns”, American Behavioral Scientist, Vol: 52, No: 5,772-786.
  • Szondi, G. (2008). Public Diplomacy and Nation Branding: Conseptual Similarities and Differences. Discussion Papers in Diplomacy, Net-herlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’, No:11.
  • Tecer, M. (2007). Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye. Ankara: TODAİE.
  • Tuch, H. N. (1990). Communicating With the World: U.S. Public Diplomacy Overseas. New York: St.Martin’s Press.
There are 26 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section Articles
Authors

Emrah Aydemir

Publication Date December 29, 2017
Acceptance Date December 8, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2017 Volume: 7 Issue: 13

Cite

APA Aydemir, E. (2017). Assessment of the Civil Society Dialogue Program between European Union and Turkey as a Public Diplomacy Implementation. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 7(13), 912-926. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.348548