Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1

Nuray Sümer

https://doi.org/10.55009/bilisimhukukudergisi.1450616

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Alarie, Benjamin, Anthony Niblett. ve Albert Yoon. “Regulation by Machine.” SSRN Electronic Journal 66. 2016. SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2878950, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2878950 68.
  • Akıllıoğlu, Tekin. Yönetim Önünde Savunma Hakları. Ankara: TODEİ. 1983.
  • Akyılmaz, Bahtiyar. İdari Usul İlkeleri Işığında İdari İşlemin Yapılış Usulü. Ankara: Yetkin Yayınları. 2000.
  • Andrews, M. “How Do Governments Build Capabilities to Do Great Things?.” iç. The Oxford Handbook of the Politics of Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2018.
  • Azrak, Ali Ülkü. Umumi İdari Usulün Teorik Esasları ve Çeşitli Hukuk Sistemlerinde Gelişimi. Doktora Tezi. İstanbul. 1964.
  • Balaram, B., T. Greenham, ve J. Ryan-Collins. Artificial Intelligence: Real Public Engagement. London: RSA. 2018. www.thersa.org/globalassets/pdfs/reports/rsa_artificial-intelligence---real-public-engagement.pdf.
  • Barocas, S. ve Andrew D. Selbst. “Big Data’s Disparate Impact.” California Law Review 104 (3): 671-732. 2016.
  • Beatson, J. “AI-Supported Adjudicators: Should Artificial Intelligence Have a Role in Tribunal Adjudication?" Canadian Journal of Administrative Law and Practise 31 (3): 307. 2018.
  • Benay, A. "Using Artificial Intelligence in Government Means Balancing Innovation with the Ethical and Responsible Use of Emerging Technologies." Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat Blog. 10 Ekim 2018. https://tbs-blog.canada.ca/en/using-artificial-intelligence-government-means-balancing-innovation-ethical-and-responsible-use.
  • Berryhill, Jamie, Kévin Kok Heang, Rob Clogher ve Keegan McBride. "Hello, World! Artificial Intelligence and its Use in the Public Sector." OECD Working Papers on Public Governance No. 36. Kasım 2019. ISSN: 19934351. https://doi.org/10.1787/19934351.
  • Burrell, Jenna. "How the Machine ‘Thinks': Understanding Opacity in Machine Learning Algorithms." Big Data and Society 3. no. 1. 2016.
  • Brynjolfsson, Eric. ve Adrew McAfee. Race Against the Machine: How the Digital Revolution is Accelerating Innovation, Driving Productivity, and Irreversibly Transforming Employment and the Economy. Lexington, Massachusetts: Digital Frontier Press. 2011.
  • Cane, P., L. McDonald. ve K. Rundle. Principles of Administrative Law. 3. bs. Oxford. South Melbourne, Victoria. 2018.
  • Cassese, S. Advanced Introduction to Global Administrative Law. Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA, USA. 2021.
  • Castets-Renard, Céline. “Human Rights and Algorithmic Impact Assessment for Predictive Policing.” iç. Constitutional Challenge in the Algoritmic Society. Cambridge University Press. 2021. 93-110.
  • Christov-Moore, Leonardo, et al. "Preventing Antisocial Robots: A Pathway to Artificial Empathy." Science Robotics 8. 2023.
  • Citron, Danielle K., ve Frank Pasquale. “The Scored Society: Due Process for Automated Predictions.” 89 Wash L Rev 1. 2014.
  • Coglianese, C. ve Lehr, David. "Regulating by Robot: Administrative Decision Making in the Machine-Learning Era." 105 Geo. L.J. 1147.2017. 1734.
  • Council of Europe. The Administration and You. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, 2018.
  • Craig, P. Understanding Administrative Law in the Common Law World. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2021.
  • Daly, P. "Artificial Administration: Administrative Law in the Age of Machines." Ottawa Faculty of Law Working Paper No. 2020-03. 2019.
  • de Laat, P. B. "Algorithmic Decision-Making Based on Machine Learning from Big Data: Can Transparency Restore Accountability?" Philosophy & Technology 31. 2018. 525-541.
  • Domingos, P. 2015. The Master Algorithm: How the Quest for the Ultimate Learning Machine Will Remake Our World. Basic Books.
  • Duran, Lütfi. “İdari Usul İlkeleri ve Kapsadığı Konular.” iç. İdari Usul Kanun Hazırlığı. Uluslararası Sempozyum Bildiriler. Ankara. 17-18 Ocak 1998. 26-35.
  • Edwards, L. ve M. Veale. "Enslaving the Algorithm: From a ‘Right to an Explanation’ to a ‘Right to Better Decisions’?" IEEE Security & Privacy 16, no. 3. 2018. 46-54.
  • Erol, Ömer Faruk. Algoritmik Regülasyon: Yapay Zeka ve İdarenin Regülasyon Faaliyeti. İstanbul: Onikilevha. 2023.
  • Eubanks, Virginia. Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. New York: St Martin’s Press. 2018.
  • Fjeld, Jessica. Nele Achten, Hannah Hilligoss, Adam Nagy, ve Madhulika Srikumar. “Principled Artificial Intelligence: Mapping Consensus in Ethical and Rights-based Approaches to Principles for AI.” Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society Research Publication No.2020-1. 2020.
  • Fredman, Sandra. Discrimination Law. Clarendon Law Series: 2.bs. 2011.
  • Heisler, N. ve Maura R. Grossman. Standards for the Control of Algorithmic Bias: The Canadian Administrative Context. CRC Press. 2024.
  • Hughes, J., ve D. P. Bryden. “Refining the Reasonable Apprehension of Bias Test: Providing Judges Better Tools for Addressing Judicial Disqualification” (2013) 36-1 Dalhousie Law Journal 171. 2013.
  • Hong, M. C., ve Hui, C. K. 2019. “Towards a digital government: Reflections on automated decision-making and the principles of administrative justice”. Singapore Academy of Law Journal, 31(2). 875–906. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.783503512786977.
  • Goodman, Bryce, ve Seth Flaxman. "EU Regulations on Algorithmic Decision-Making and a Right to Explanation." AI Magazine 38, no. 3. 2017: 50.
  • Goudge, Amy. “Administrative Law, Artificial Intelligence, and Procedural Rights”. 42 Windsor Review of Legal and Social Issues 17. 2021.
  • Kahneman, D. Hızlı ve Yavaş Düşünme. çev. Filiz Deniztekin, Osman Ç. Deniztekin. Varlık Yayınları.
  • Kağıtçıoğlu, Mutlu. “Yapay Zekâ ve İdare Hukuku (Bugünden Geleceğe Yönelik Bir Değerlendirme).” Hacettepe Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 11/ 1. 2021. 118-68.
  • Kaku, Michio. Geleceğin Fiziği. çev. Yasemin Saraç Oymak, Hüseyin Oymak. Ankara: Odtü Yayıncılık. 13. bs. 2021.
  • Kılıç, Muharrem. ve Sezer Bozkuş Kahyaoğlu. Algorithmic Discrimination and Ethical Perspective of Artificial Intelligence. Springer. 2024.
  • Kortz, M., ve F. Doshi-Velez. "Accountability of AI Under the Law: The Role of Explanation." Berkman Klein Center, Cambridge, MA, 2017.
  • Kurzweil, Ray. İnsanlık 2.0. çev. Mine Şengel. İstanbul: Alfa Yayınları. 7. bs. 2019.
  • Lee, Kai Fu., ve Chen Quifan. AI 2041 Ten Visions for Our Future. New York: Currency. 2021.
  • Liston, M. “Alert, Alive and Sensitive’: Baker, the Duty to Give Reasons, and the Ethos of Justification in Canadian Public Law.” iç. The Unity of Public Law. David Dyzenhaus, ed. Oxford: Hart Publishing. 113-141. 2004.
  • Lu, Yiwen. Generative A.I. Can Add $4.4 Trillion in Value to Global Economy, Study Says, newyorktimes.com, erişim tarihi 19.03.2024.
  • Michael Chui ve diğerleri. “The economic potential of generative AI: The next productivity frontier” (14.06.2023) https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/the-economic-potential-of-generative-ai-the-next-productivity-frontier?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email#introduction, erişim tarihi 19.03.2024.)
  • Oğurlu, Yücel. “Yapay Zekanın İdare Hukuku ve İdari Yargıda Doğuracağı Tartışmalar.” iç. İdare Hukuku ve İdari Yargı Uluslararası Sempozyumu. (24-26 Mayıs 2021). ss. 59-91.
  • O’Neil, Cathy. Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. Harlow, England: Penguin Books. 2017.
  • Owen, T. “The Violence of Algorithms.” iç. Disruptive Power: The Crisis of the State in the Digital Age. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2015.
  • Özkan, Gürsel. “İdari Usul Kanununda Düzenlenmesi Gereken Genel İdari Usul İlkeleri.” iç. İdari Usul Kanun Hazırlığı Uluslararası Sempozyum Bildiriler. 17-18 Ocak 1998. Ankara. ss. 55—78.
  • Raso, J. “AI and Administrative Law” iç. Artificial Intelligence and the Law in Canada, S. Florian Martin-Bariteau ve Teresa Scassa, eds, Toronto: LexisNexis. 2021.
  • Russell, Stuart J., ve Peter Norvig. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. 4. bs. Pearson Education. 2021.
  • Scassa, T., “Administrative Law and the Governance of Automated Decision Making: A Critical Look at Canada's Directive on Automated Decision Making.” U.B.C. Law Review 54 (1): 251-[vi]. 2021.
  • Shao, Ruosi. "An Empathetic AI for Mental Health Intervention: Conceptualizing and Examining Artificial Empathy." iç. Proceedings of the 2nd Empathy-Centric Design Workshop, 1-6. 2023.
  • Schwartz, Reva. ve diğerleri. “Towards a Standard for Identifying and Managing Bias in Artificial Intelligence.” NIST Special Publication 1270. 2022.
  • Schmidhuber, Jürgen. “Deep Learning in Neural Networks: An Overview.” Neural Networks 61 85-117. 2015.
  • Weizenbaum, J. Computer Power and Human Reason: From Judgment to Calculation. New York: W. H. Freeman & Co. 1976.
  • Weizenbaum, Joseph. “ELIZA - A Computer Program for The Study of Natural Language Communication Between Man and Machine.” Communications of the ACM 9(1): 36–45. 1966.
  • Williams, Rebecca. “Rethinking Administrative Law for Algorithmic Decision Making.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 42, no. 2: 468-494. 2022.
  • Williams, Bernard. “The Idea of Equality.” iç. In the Beginning Was the Deed: Realism and Moralism in Political Argument, ed. Geoffrey Hawthorn, 97–114. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 2005.
  • Wolswinkel, Johan. Artificial Intelligence and Administrative Law, Council of Europe. https://www.coe.int/cdcj. 2022.
  • Wolswinkel, Johan. Comparative Study on Administrative Law and The Use of Artificial Intelligence and Other Algorithmic Systems in Administrative Decision-Making in the Member States of the Council of Europe. Council of Europe.
  • Yayla, Ahmet. İdare Hukuku Bakımından Yapay Zeka. Ankara: Seçkin. 2023.
  • Zalnieriute, Monika., Lyria Bennett Moses. ve George Williams. “The Rule of Law and Automation of Government Decision-Making.” Modern Law Review. UNSW Law Research Paper No. 19-14. 2019.

KANADA’DA İDARENİN KARAR ALMA SÜREÇLERİNDE YAPAY ZEKAYI KULLANIMI: OTOMATİK KARAR ALMA YÖNERGESİ

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1

Nuray Sümer

https://doi.org/10.55009/bilisimhukukudergisi.1450616

Öz

Kanada’da idarenin yapay zekâ ve algoritma kullanımını doğrudan düzenleyen ilgili bir yasa bulunmamaktadır. Bu boşluk, idarenin genel düzenleyici işlemleriyle doldurulmaktadır. Kanada Federal Hükümeti, kamu hizmetinin görülüş usulleri, bilgi teknolojileri, siber güvenlik gibi konularda Kamu Hizmeti ve Dijital Politikaları yayınlamaktadır. Otomatik Karar Alma Yönergesi (Directive on Automated Desicion-Making), idarenin algoritmaya dayalı karar alma süreçlerinin eşitlik, tarafsızlık, şeffaflık, katılım ilkesi, gerekçe yükümlülüğü gibi usuli adalet kapsamındaki ilkeler üzerinde ortaya çıkaracağı muhtemel sorunları bertaraf etmeye yönelik Algoritmik Etki Değerlendirmesi (Algorithmic Impact Assessment) öngörmektedir. Bu çalışmada Kanada’daki bu düzenleme esas alınarak algoritma çağında idarenin karar alma süreçlerinde yapay zekayı kullanımı irdelenecektir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

idari işlem otomasyon yapay zeka algoritmik etki değerlendirmesi Kanada

Kaynakça

  • Alarie, Benjamin, Anthony Niblett. ve Albert Yoon. “Regulation by Machine.” SSRN Electronic Journal 66. 2016. SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2878950, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2878950 68.
  • Akıllıoğlu, Tekin. Yönetim Önünde Savunma Hakları. Ankara: TODEİ. 1983.
  • Akyılmaz, Bahtiyar. İdari Usul İlkeleri Işığında İdari İşlemin Yapılış Usulü. Ankara: Yetkin Yayınları. 2000.
  • Andrews, M. “How Do Governments Build Capabilities to Do Great Things?.” iç. The Oxford Handbook of the Politics of Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2018.
  • Azrak, Ali Ülkü. Umumi İdari Usulün Teorik Esasları ve Çeşitli Hukuk Sistemlerinde Gelişimi. Doktora Tezi. İstanbul. 1964.
  • Balaram, B., T. Greenham, ve J. Ryan-Collins. Artificial Intelligence: Real Public Engagement. London: RSA. 2018. www.thersa.org/globalassets/pdfs/reports/rsa_artificial-intelligence---real-public-engagement.pdf.
  • Barocas, S. ve Andrew D. Selbst. “Big Data’s Disparate Impact.” California Law Review 104 (3): 671-732. 2016.
  • Beatson, J. “AI-Supported Adjudicators: Should Artificial Intelligence Have a Role in Tribunal Adjudication?" Canadian Journal of Administrative Law and Practise 31 (3): 307. 2018.
  • Benay, A. "Using Artificial Intelligence in Government Means Balancing Innovation with the Ethical and Responsible Use of Emerging Technologies." Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat Blog. 10 Ekim 2018. https://tbs-blog.canada.ca/en/using-artificial-intelligence-government-means-balancing-innovation-ethical-and-responsible-use.
  • Berryhill, Jamie, Kévin Kok Heang, Rob Clogher ve Keegan McBride. "Hello, World! Artificial Intelligence and its Use in the Public Sector." OECD Working Papers on Public Governance No. 36. Kasım 2019. ISSN: 19934351. https://doi.org/10.1787/19934351.
  • Burrell, Jenna. "How the Machine ‘Thinks': Understanding Opacity in Machine Learning Algorithms." Big Data and Society 3. no. 1. 2016.
  • Brynjolfsson, Eric. ve Adrew McAfee. Race Against the Machine: How the Digital Revolution is Accelerating Innovation, Driving Productivity, and Irreversibly Transforming Employment and the Economy. Lexington, Massachusetts: Digital Frontier Press. 2011.
  • Cane, P., L. McDonald. ve K. Rundle. Principles of Administrative Law. 3. bs. Oxford. South Melbourne, Victoria. 2018.
  • Cassese, S. Advanced Introduction to Global Administrative Law. Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA, USA. 2021.
  • Castets-Renard, Céline. “Human Rights and Algorithmic Impact Assessment for Predictive Policing.” iç. Constitutional Challenge in the Algoritmic Society. Cambridge University Press. 2021. 93-110.
  • Christov-Moore, Leonardo, et al. "Preventing Antisocial Robots: A Pathway to Artificial Empathy." Science Robotics 8. 2023.
  • Citron, Danielle K., ve Frank Pasquale. “The Scored Society: Due Process for Automated Predictions.” 89 Wash L Rev 1. 2014.
  • Coglianese, C. ve Lehr, David. "Regulating by Robot: Administrative Decision Making in the Machine-Learning Era." 105 Geo. L.J. 1147.2017. 1734.
  • Council of Europe. The Administration and You. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, 2018.
  • Craig, P. Understanding Administrative Law in the Common Law World. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2021.
  • Daly, P. "Artificial Administration: Administrative Law in the Age of Machines." Ottawa Faculty of Law Working Paper No. 2020-03. 2019.
  • de Laat, P. B. "Algorithmic Decision-Making Based on Machine Learning from Big Data: Can Transparency Restore Accountability?" Philosophy & Technology 31. 2018. 525-541.
  • Domingos, P. 2015. The Master Algorithm: How the Quest for the Ultimate Learning Machine Will Remake Our World. Basic Books.
  • Duran, Lütfi. “İdari Usul İlkeleri ve Kapsadığı Konular.” iç. İdari Usul Kanun Hazırlığı. Uluslararası Sempozyum Bildiriler. Ankara. 17-18 Ocak 1998. 26-35.
  • Edwards, L. ve M. Veale. "Enslaving the Algorithm: From a ‘Right to an Explanation’ to a ‘Right to Better Decisions’?" IEEE Security & Privacy 16, no. 3. 2018. 46-54.
  • Erol, Ömer Faruk. Algoritmik Regülasyon: Yapay Zeka ve İdarenin Regülasyon Faaliyeti. İstanbul: Onikilevha. 2023.
  • Eubanks, Virginia. Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. New York: St Martin’s Press. 2018.
  • Fjeld, Jessica. Nele Achten, Hannah Hilligoss, Adam Nagy, ve Madhulika Srikumar. “Principled Artificial Intelligence: Mapping Consensus in Ethical and Rights-based Approaches to Principles for AI.” Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society Research Publication No.2020-1. 2020.
  • Fredman, Sandra. Discrimination Law. Clarendon Law Series: 2.bs. 2011.
  • Heisler, N. ve Maura R. Grossman. Standards for the Control of Algorithmic Bias: The Canadian Administrative Context. CRC Press. 2024.
  • Hughes, J., ve D. P. Bryden. “Refining the Reasonable Apprehension of Bias Test: Providing Judges Better Tools for Addressing Judicial Disqualification” (2013) 36-1 Dalhousie Law Journal 171. 2013.
  • Hong, M. C., ve Hui, C. K. 2019. “Towards a digital government: Reflections on automated decision-making and the principles of administrative justice”. Singapore Academy of Law Journal, 31(2). 875–906. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.783503512786977.
  • Goodman, Bryce, ve Seth Flaxman. "EU Regulations on Algorithmic Decision-Making and a Right to Explanation." AI Magazine 38, no. 3. 2017: 50.
  • Goudge, Amy. “Administrative Law, Artificial Intelligence, and Procedural Rights”. 42 Windsor Review of Legal and Social Issues 17. 2021.
  • Kahneman, D. Hızlı ve Yavaş Düşünme. çev. Filiz Deniztekin, Osman Ç. Deniztekin. Varlık Yayınları.
  • Kağıtçıoğlu, Mutlu. “Yapay Zekâ ve İdare Hukuku (Bugünden Geleceğe Yönelik Bir Değerlendirme).” Hacettepe Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 11/ 1. 2021. 118-68.
  • Kaku, Michio. Geleceğin Fiziği. çev. Yasemin Saraç Oymak, Hüseyin Oymak. Ankara: Odtü Yayıncılık. 13. bs. 2021.
  • Kılıç, Muharrem. ve Sezer Bozkuş Kahyaoğlu. Algorithmic Discrimination and Ethical Perspective of Artificial Intelligence. Springer. 2024.
  • Kortz, M., ve F. Doshi-Velez. "Accountability of AI Under the Law: The Role of Explanation." Berkman Klein Center, Cambridge, MA, 2017.
  • Kurzweil, Ray. İnsanlık 2.0. çev. Mine Şengel. İstanbul: Alfa Yayınları. 7. bs. 2019.
  • Lee, Kai Fu., ve Chen Quifan. AI 2041 Ten Visions for Our Future. New York: Currency. 2021.
  • Liston, M. “Alert, Alive and Sensitive’: Baker, the Duty to Give Reasons, and the Ethos of Justification in Canadian Public Law.” iç. The Unity of Public Law. David Dyzenhaus, ed. Oxford: Hart Publishing. 113-141. 2004.
  • Lu, Yiwen. Generative A.I. Can Add $4.4 Trillion in Value to Global Economy, Study Says, newyorktimes.com, erişim tarihi 19.03.2024.
  • Michael Chui ve diğerleri. “The economic potential of generative AI: The next productivity frontier” (14.06.2023) https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/the-economic-potential-of-generative-ai-the-next-productivity-frontier?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email#introduction, erişim tarihi 19.03.2024.)
  • Oğurlu, Yücel. “Yapay Zekanın İdare Hukuku ve İdari Yargıda Doğuracağı Tartışmalar.” iç. İdare Hukuku ve İdari Yargı Uluslararası Sempozyumu. (24-26 Mayıs 2021). ss. 59-91.
  • O’Neil, Cathy. Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. Harlow, England: Penguin Books. 2017.
  • Owen, T. “The Violence of Algorithms.” iç. Disruptive Power: The Crisis of the State in the Digital Age. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2015.
  • Özkan, Gürsel. “İdari Usul Kanununda Düzenlenmesi Gereken Genel İdari Usul İlkeleri.” iç. İdari Usul Kanun Hazırlığı Uluslararası Sempozyum Bildiriler. 17-18 Ocak 1998. Ankara. ss. 55—78.
  • Raso, J. “AI and Administrative Law” iç. Artificial Intelligence and the Law in Canada, S. Florian Martin-Bariteau ve Teresa Scassa, eds, Toronto: LexisNexis. 2021.
  • Russell, Stuart J., ve Peter Norvig. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. 4. bs. Pearson Education. 2021.
  • Scassa, T., “Administrative Law and the Governance of Automated Decision Making: A Critical Look at Canada's Directive on Automated Decision Making.” U.B.C. Law Review 54 (1): 251-[vi]. 2021.
  • Shao, Ruosi. "An Empathetic AI for Mental Health Intervention: Conceptualizing and Examining Artificial Empathy." iç. Proceedings of the 2nd Empathy-Centric Design Workshop, 1-6. 2023.
  • Schwartz, Reva. ve diğerleri. “Towards a Standard for Identifying and Managing Bias in Artificial Intelligence.” NIST Special Publication 1270. 2022.
  • Schmidhuber, Jürgen. “Deep Learning in Neural Networks: An Overview.” Neural Networks 61 85-117. 2015.
  • Weizenbaum, J. Computer Power and Human Reason: From Judgment to Calculation. New York: W. H. Freeman & Co. 1976.
  • Weizenbaum, Joseph. “ELIZA - A Computer Program for The Study of Natural Language Communication Between Man and Machine.” Communications of the ACM 9(1): 36–45. 1966.
  • Williams, Rebecca. “Rethinking Administrative Law for Algorithmic Decision Making.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 42, no. 2: 468-494. 2022.
  • Williams, Bernard. “The Idea of Equality.” iç. In the Beginning Was the Deed: Realism and Moralism in Political Argument, ed. Geoffrey Hawthorn, 97–114. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 2005.
  • Wolswinkel, Johan. Artificial Intelligence and Administrative Law, Council of Europe. https://www.coe.int/cdcj. 2022.
  • Wolswinkel, Johan. Comparative Study on Administrative Law and The Use of Artificial Intelligence and Other Algorithmic Systems in Administrative Decision-Making in the Member States of the Council of Europe. Council of Europe.
  • Yayla, Ahmet. İdare Hukuku Bakımından Yapay Zeka. Ankara: Seçkin. 2023.
  • Zalnieriute, Monika., Lyria Bennett Moses. ve George Williams. “The Rule of Law and Automation of Government Decision-Making.” Modern Law Review. UNSW Law Research Paper No. 19-14. 2019.
Toplam 62 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Bilişim ve Teknoloji Hukuku, Hukuk (Diğer)
Bölüm Araştırma Makaleleri
Yazarlar

Nuray Sümer 0000-0001-7404-7811

Erken Görünüm Tarihi 12 Mayıs 2024
Yayımlanma Tarihi
Gönderilme Tarihi 10 Mart 2024
Kabul Tarihi 4 Mayıs 2024
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2024 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

Chicago Sümer, Nuray. “KANADA’DA İDARENİN KARAR ALMA SÜREÇLERİNDE YAPAY ZEKAYI KULLANIMI: OTOMATİK KARAR ALMA YÖNERGESİ”. Bilişim Hukuku Dergisi 6, sy. 1 (Mayıs 2024). https://doi.org/10.55009/bilisimhukukudergisi.1450616.

23439

Bilişim Hukuku Dergisi Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.