Türkiye Spor Toto Süper Ligi Kulüplerinin Ev Sahibi Olma Avantajı

HAKAN Öndes

doi:10.17644/sbd.386809

Araştırma Makalesi

Home Ground Advantages of Turkey Spor Toto Super League Clubs

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 30 Sayı: 2, 74 - 84, 06.09.2019

HAKAN Öndes

https://doi.org/10.17644/sbd.386809

Cited By: 9

Öz

It is known that the home
ground advantage plays an important role in the result of professional football
games and is influenced by various factors. The main factors are audience
support, travel influence, familiarity with the game rules of the national
league, prejudices of referees, region and psychological effects. This study
aimed to investigate the effects and differences of the presence of the home
advantage on match results. This is why the scope of work including Turkey Spor
Toto 1995/96 and 2016/17 season for all the teams in the Super League was
assessed a total of 6732 match. In the study, comparison of home and away teams
was done using paired sample t-test. The effect size was estimated using
Cohen's d statistic. The average overall advantage of home ground was found to
be 62.69% and the home teams collected 65.75% more points than the away teams
(t = 20.83, d = 8.73, effect size (r): 0.97). The advantage of being a home
ground in derby games is lower than the other games played. This is consistent
with expectations considering the strong football team of Turkey. The advantage
of hosting champions teams was average 26.3% (t = 5.23, d = 3.09, effect size
(r): 0.61), while this ratio was 66.7% (t = 7.84, d = 5.63, (r): 0.75) for
relegated teams. This result is an important advantage to be a home position,
as well as the championship and stay in the league for the away games that
points are important.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Home ground advantage, Turkey spor toto süper league, Paired sample t-test, Cohen’s d statistics

Kaynakça

1. Allen MS, Jones MV. (2014). The home advantage over the first 20 seasons of the English Premier League: Effects of shirt colour, team ability and time trends. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 12, 10-18.
2. Armatas V, Pollard R. (2014). Home advantage in greek football. European Journal of Sport Science, 14, 116-122.
3. Boyko RH, Boyko AR, Boyko MG. (2007). Referee bias contributes to home advantage in english Premiership football. Journal of Sports Sciences, 25, 1185-1194.
4. Clarke SR, Norman JM. (1995). Home ground advantage of individual clubs in english soccer. Journal Of The Royal Statistical Society, 44, 509-521.
5. Cohen J. (1992). Statistical power analysis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 98- 101.
6. Fan X. (2001). Statistical significance and effect size in education research: Two sides of a coin. Journal of Educational Research, 94, 275-283.
7. Garcia MS, Aguilar OG, Marques PS, Tobío GT, Romero JF. (2013). Calculating home advantage in the first decade of the 21th century uefa soccer leagues. Journal of Human Kinetics, 38, 141-150.
8. Goumas C. (2014). Home advantage in australian soccer. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 17, 119-12.
9. Göral K. (2015). Türkiye futbol süper liginde ev sahibi olma avantajı. Uluslararası Hakemli Akademik Spor Sağlık ve Tıp Bilimleri Dergisi, 5, 72-82.
10. Gürkan O, Göral K, Saygın Ö. (2017). Profesyonel futbolda ev sahibi olma avantajı: Türkiye 1. liginin analizi. International Journal Of Human Sciences, 14, 3292-3299.
11. Leite W SS. (2017). Home advantage: Comparison between the major european football leagues. Athens Journal of Sports, 4, 65-74.
12. Nickerson RS. (2000). Null hypothesis significance testing: A review of an old and continuing controversy. Psychological Methods, 52, 241-301.
13. Pollard R. (1986). Home advantage in soccer: a retrospective analysis. Journal of Sports Sciences, 4, 237-248.
14. Pollard R. (2002), Evidence of a reduced home advantage when a team moves to a new stadium. Journal of Sports Sciences, 2, 969-973.
15. Pollard R. (2006). Worldwide regional variations in home advantage in association football. Journal of Sports Sciences, 24, 231-240.
16. Pollard R, Silva C, Medeiros C. (2008). Home advantage in football in Brazil: differences between teams and the effects of distance travelled. Brazilian Journal of Soccer Science, 1, 3-10.
17. Pollard R, Gomez MA. (2009). Home advantage in football in south-west europe: Long-term trends, regional variation, and team differences. European Journal of Sport Science, 9, 341-352.
18. Seçkin A. (2006). Home advantage in association football: Evidence from turkish super league. ECOMOD Conference in Hong Kong, June 28-30, China.
19. Seçkin A, Pollard R. (2008). Home advantage in turkish professional soccer. Perceptual and motor skills, 107, 51-54.

Türkiye Spor Toto Süper Ligi Kulüplerinin Ev Sahibi Olma Avantajı

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 30 Sayı: 2, 74 - 84, 06.09.2019

HAKAN Öndes

https://doi.org/10.17644/sbd.386809

Cited By: 9

Öz

Ev sahibi olma avantajının
profesyonel futbol müsabakalarının sonucunu belirlemede önemli bir rol oynadığı
ve çeşitli faktörlerden etkilendiği bilinmektedir. Söz konusu ana faktörler,
seyirci desteği, seyahat etkisi, ulusal ligin oyun koşullarına aşinalık, hakem
ön yargıları, bölge ve psikolojik etkiler olabilmektedir. Bu çalışmada ev
sahibi olma durumunun maç sonuçlarına etkisi ve farklılıkları amaçlanmıştır. Bu
sebeple Türkiye Spor Toto Süper Ligi'ndeki tüm takımlar için 1995/96 ile
2016/17 sezonları çalışma kapsamında toplam 6732 maç değerlendirilmiştir.
Çalışmada, ev sahibi ve deplasman takımların karşılaştırması eşleştirilmiş
örneklem t testi kullanılarak yapılmıştır. Etki boyutu, Cohen'in d istatistiği
kullanılarak tahmin edilmiştir. Buna göre genel düzeyde ev sahibi olma
avantajının ortalaması %62.69 olarak bulunmuştur ve ev sahibi takımlar
deplasman takımlara göre %65.75 daha fazla puan toplamıştır (t=20.83, d=8.73,
etki boyutu(r):0.97). Ev sahibi olma avantajı yüzdesi derbilerde diğer oynanan
maçlara göre daha düşük çıkmıştır. Bu durum Türkiye futbolunun güçlü takımları
düşünüldüğünde beklentilerle tutarlıdır. Analiz kapsamında, şampiyon takımların
ev sahibi olma avantajı ortalama %26.3 (t=5.23, d=3.09, etki boyutu(r):0.61),
iken küme düşen takımlarda ise bu oranın %66.7(t=7.84, d=5.63, etki
boyutu(r):0.75) olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Bu sonuç ev sahibi olmanın önemli
bir avantaj olduğu ancak şampiyonluk ve ligde kalmak adına deplasman
maçlarından alınacak puanların da önemli olduğunu göstermiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ev sahibi olma avantajı, Türkiye spor toto süper ligi, Eşleştirilmiş örneklem t testi, Cohen'in d İstatistiği

Kaynakça

1. Allen MS, Jones MV. (2014). The home advantage over the first 20 seasons of the English Premier League: Effects of shirt colour, team ability and time trends. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 12, 10-18.
2. Armatas V, Pollard R. (2014). Home advantage in greek football. European Journal of Sport Science, 14, 116-122.
3. Boyko RH, Boyko AR, Boyko MG. (2007). Referee bias contributes to home advantage in english Premiership football. Journal of Sports Sciences, 25, 1185-1194.
4. Clarke SR, Norman JM. (1995). Home ground advantage of individual clubs in english soccer. Journal Of The Royal Statistical Society, 44, 509-521.
5. Cohen J. (1992). Statistical power analysis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 98- 101.
6. Fan X. (2001). Statistical significance and effect size in education research: Two sides of a coin. Journal of Educational Research, 94, 275-283.
7. Garcia MS, Aguilar OG, Marques PS, Tobío GT, Romero JF. (2013). Calculating home advantage in the first decade of the 21th century uefa soccer leagues. Journal of Human Kinetics, 38, 141-150.
8. Goumas C. (2014). Home advantage in australian soccer. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 17, 119-12.
9. Göral K. (2015). Türkiye futbol süper liginde ev sahibi olma avantajı. Uluslararası Hakemli Akademik Spor Sağlık ve Tıp Bilimleri Dergisi, 5, 72-82.
10. Gürkan O, Göral K, Saygın Ö. (2017). Profesyonel futbolda ev sahibi olma avantajı: Türkiye 1. liginin analizi. International Journal Of Human Sciences, 14, 3292-3299.
11. Leite W SS. (2017). Home advantage: Comparison between the major european football leagues. Athens Journal of Sports, 4, 65-74.
12. Nickerson RS. (2000). Null hypothesis significance testing: A review of an old and continuing controversy. Psychological Methods, 52, 241-301.
13. Pollard R. (1986). Home advantage in soccer: a retrospective analysis. Journal of Sports Sciences, 4, 237-248.
14. Pollard R. (2002), Evidence of a reduced home advantage when a team moves to a new stadium. Journal of Sports Sciences, 2, 969-973.
15. Pollard R. (2006). Worldwide regional variations in home advantage in association football. Journal of Sports Sciences, 24, 231-240.
16. Pollard R, Silva C, Medeiros C. (2008). Home advantage in football in Brazil: differences between teams and the effects of distance travelled. Brazilian Journal of Soccer Science, 1, 3-10.
17. Pollard R, Gomez MA. (2009). Home advantage in football in south-west europe: Long-term trends, regional variation, and team differences. European Journal of Sport Science, 9, 341-352.
18. Seçkin A. (2006). Home advantage in association football: Evidence from turkish super league. ECOMOD Conference in Hong Kong, June 28-30, China.
19. Seçkin A, Pollard R. (2008). Home advantage in turkish professional soccer. Perceptual and motor skills, 107, 51-54.

Toplam 19 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil	Türkçe
Konular	Spor Hekimliği
Bölüm	Makaleler
Yazarlar	HAKAN Öndes 0000-0002-0618-7705
Yayımlanma Tarihi	6 Eylül 2019
Gönderilme Tarihi	30 Ocak 2018
Yayımlandığı Sayı	Yıl 2019 Cilt: 30 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA	Öndes, H. (2019). Türkiye Spor Toto Süper Ligi Kulüplerinin Ev Sahibi Olma Avantajı. Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 30(2), 74-84. https://doi.org/10.17644/sbd.386809