Abstract
References
- Aarseth, E. J. (1997). Cybertext: Perspectives on Ergodic Literature. Baltimore, Londra: John Hopkins University Press.
- Aarseth, E. (2001). Computer Game Studies, Year One. Game Studies, 1(1), Temmuz 2001. Erişim 15 Nisan 2017, http://gamestudies.org/0101/editorial.html
- Aarseth, E. (2004). Genre Trouble: Narrativism and the Art of Simulation. N. Wardrip-Fruin, P. Harrigan, (Ed.), First Person: New Media as Story, Performance, and Game içinde (45-55). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
- Aarseth, E. (2006). How We Became Postdigital: From Cyberculture Studies to Game Studies. D. Silver ve A. Massanari, (Ed.), Critical Cyberculture Studies içinde (37-46). New York, Londra: New York University Press.
- Allen, S. (2014). Video Games as Feminist Pedagogy. Loading…, 8(13). Erişim 10 Nisan 2016, http://journals.sfu.ca/loading/index.php/loading/article/view/135
Abstract
Étant donné que les jeux numériques sont des produits éminents de la culture visuelle postmoderne, leur étude menée par les sciences sociales et les sciences humaines a fait l’objet d’un débat académique depuis le début des années 2000. Les questions de ce que les jeux sont et comment ils peuvent / doivent être étudiés et par implication des réponses qui leur sont données, qui peut / doit les étudier, a abouti au débat bien connu dans le domaine intitulé «Ludologie contre Narratologie». Les deux approches qui donnent leur nom au débat ont été critiquées pour être excessivement formalistes et réductrices. À travers une revue de la littérature couvrant les deux parties et leurs critiques sur le débat «Ludologie contre Narratologie», cette étude vise à examiner et discuter ces deux approches et leurs critiques, ainsi que deux cadres théoriques ; la culture algorithmique d’Alexander R. Galloway et la rhétorique procédurale d’Ian Bogost, qui promettent de surmonter les limites formelles de ces deux approches.
References
- Aarseth, E. J. (1997). Cybertext: Perspectives on Ergodic Literature. Baltimore, Londra: John Hopkins University Press.
- Aarseth, E. (2001). Computer Game Studies, Year One. Game Studies, 1(1), Temmuz 2001. Erişim 15 Nisan 2017, http://gamestudies.org/0101/editorial.html
- Aarseth, E. (2004). Genre Trouble: Narrativism and the Art of Simulation. N. Wardrip-Fruin, P. Harrigan, (Ed.), First Person: New Media as Story, Performance, and Game içinde (45-55). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
- Aarseth, E. (2006). How We Became Postdigital: From Cyberculture Studies to Game Studies. D. Silver ve A. Massanari, (Ed.), Critical Cyberculture Studies içinde (37-46). New York, Londra: New York University Press.
- Allen, S. (2014). Video Games as Feminist Pedagogy. Loading…, 8(13). Erişim 10 Nisan 2016, http://journals.sfu.ca/loading/index.php/loading/article/view/135
Abstract
The study of digital games by social sciences and humanities have been the subject of an academic debate since early 2000s. The questions of what games are, how they can/should be studied, and by implicationof the answers given to these questions, who can/should study them resulted in the well-known debate in the field named “Ludology vs. Narratology”. Both approaches which give their names to this debate were criticized for being overly formalistic and reductive. Through a literature review covering both parties and their critiques, this study aims to examine and discuss these two approaches, their critiques, and two alternative theoretical frameworks, Alexander R. Galloway’s algorithmic culture, and Ian Bogost’s procedural rhetoric, which seem promising in their potential to overcome the formalist limitations of these approaches.
References
- Aarseth, E. J. (1997). Cybertext: Perspectives on Ergodic Literature. Baltimore, Londra: John Hopkins University Press.
- Aarseth, E. (2001). Computer Game Studies, Year One. Game Studies, 1(1), Temmuz 2001. Erişim 15 Nisan 2017, http://gamestudies.org/0101/editorial.html
- Aarseth, E. (2004). Genre Trouble: Narrativism and the Art of Simulation. N. Wardrip-Fruin, P. Harrigan, (Ed.), First Person: New Media as Story, Performance, and Game içinde (45-55). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
- Aarseth, E. (2006). How We Became Postdigital: From Cyberculture Studies to Game Studies. D. Silver ve A. Massanari, (Ed.), Critical Cyberculture Studies içinde (37-46). New York, Londra: New York University Press.
- Allen, S. (2014). Video Games as Feminist Pedagogy. Loading…, 8(13). Erişim 10 Nisan 2016, http://journals.sfu.ca/loading/index.php/loading/article/view/135
Details
| Journal Section | Articles |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | December 29, 2017 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2017Issue: 27 |
Cited By
Analysis of the Ghost of Tsushima Game According to the Actantial Model of Griemas
Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.51290/dpusbe.1162644
Dijital Oyunlarda Oynanış ve Anlatı İlişkisi: DayZ Oyunu ve Village Topluluğu
Galatasaray Üniversitesi İleti-ş-im Dergisi
Yavuz DEMİRBAŞ
https://doi.org/10.16878/gsuilet.620851
İLETİŞİM BİLİMİNDE DİJİTAL OYUNLAR ÜZERİNE YAPILAN ÇALIŞMALARIN BETİMSEL ANALİZİ
Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Akademi Dergisi
Alp Eren ERBAY
https://doi.org/10.47994/usbad.817988
