Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Two Arguments About Women’s Rights in the Türk Kadını Magazine 1966-1974

Year 2017, Issue: 27, 135 - 152, 29.12.2017
https://doi.org/10.16878/gsuilet.373246

Abstract

This article presents two arguments about women’s rights in Turkey and the lack of their implementation, as developed in the Türk Kadını magazine, published between 1966 and 1974. Our study is qualitative rather than quantitative, aiming at pointing to the existence of a certain discourse rather than to prove its impact. The results of our study contribute to the wider field of Turkish women’s studies, by showing the presence of certain arguments concerning women’s rights that has not been previously studied; moreover, our study points to the value of historical media studies to the wider field of empirical women’s studies. The two arguments are the incomplete emancipation of Anatolian women argument (IEAWA) and the emancipated but unliberated Turkish women argument (EUTWA), respectively. While the two arguments point to different explanations for the lack of implementation of Turkish women’s rights, both focus on the context and conditions of Anatolian women.

References

  • Abadan-Unat, N. (1991). The Impact of Legal and Educational Reforms on Turkish Women. In N. R. Keddie and B. Baron (Eds.), Women in Middle Eastern History (177-194). Yale University Press.
  • Arat, Y. (1996). On Gender and Citizenship in Turkey, Middle East Report 198, 28-31.
  • Arat, Y. (2000). From Emancipation to Liberation: the Changing Role of Women in Turkey’s Public Realm, Journal of International Affairs 54 (1), 107-126.
  • Arat, Y. (2001). Women’s Rights as Human Rights: The Turkish Case, Human Rights Review 3 (1), 27-34.
  • Arat, Y. (2005). Women’s Challenge to Citizenship in Turkey. In F. Birtek & T. Dragonas (Eds.), Citizenship and the Nation-State in Greece and Turkey, (104-116). London and New York: Routledge.
  • Arat, Z. (1998). Educating the Daughters of the Republic. In Z. F. Arat (Ed.), Deconstructing Images of Turkish Woman (175-181). New York: St. Martin’s Press.
  • Atkinson, P. and Coffey, A. (2004). Analysing Documentary Realities. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice (2nd ed.) (56-75). London: Sage.
  • Çaha, Ö. (2010). Sivil Kadın Türkiye’de Kadın ve Sivil Toplum (Genişletilmiş 2. Baskı). Ankara: Savaş Yayınevi.
  • Çakır, S. (1996). Osmanlı Kadın Hareketi. İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.
  • Durakbaşa, A. (1998a). Kemalism as Identity Politics in Turkey. In Z. F. Arat (Ed.), Deconstructing Images of Turkish Woman (139-156). New York: St. Martin’s Press.
  • Durakbaşa, A. (1998b) Cumhuriyet Döneminde Modern Kadın ve Erkek Kimliklerinin Oluşumu: Kemalist Kadın Kimliği ve ‘Münevver Erkekler’. In A. Berktay Hacımirzaoğlu (Ed.), 75. Yılda Kadınlar ve Erkekler (29-51). İstanbul: Türkiye Ekonomik ve Toplumsal Tarih Vakfı.
  • Durakbaşa, A. and İlyasoglu A. (2001). Formation of Gender Identities in Republican Turkey and Women’s Narratives as Transmitters of ‘Herstory’ of Modernization. Journal of Social History 35 (1), 195-203.

Deux arguments sur les droits de la femme dans le magazine Türk Kadını 1966-1974

Year 2017, Issue: 27, 135 - 152, 29.12.2017
https://doi.org/10.16878/gsuilet.373246

Abstract

Cet article présente deux arguments sur les droits des femmes en Turquie et le manque de leur mise en oeuvre, développés dans le magazine Türk Kadını, publié entre 1966 et 1974. Notre étude est qualitative plutôt que quantitative, visant à montrer l’existence d’un certain discours plutôt que pour prouver son impact. Les résultats de notre étude contribuent au domaine plus large des études féminines turques, en montrant la présence de certains arguments concernant les droits des femmes qui n’ont pas été étudiés auparavant; de plus, notre étude souligne la valeur des études sur les médias historiques dans le domaine plus large des études empiriques sur les femmes. Les deux arguments sont l’argument de l’émancipation incomplète des femmes anatoliennes (IEAWA) et l’argument des femmes turques émancipées mais non libérées (EUTWA), respectivement. Alors que les deux arguments suggèrent des explications différentes pour le manque de mise en oeuvre des droits des femmes turques, tous deux se concentrent sur le contexte et les conditions des femmes anatoliennes.

References

  • Abadan-Unat, N. (1991). The Impact of Legal and Educational Reforms on Turkish Women. In N. R. Keddie and B. Baron (Eds.), Women in Middle Eastern History (177-194). Yale University Press.
  • Arat, Y. (1996). On Gender and Citizenship in Turkey, Middle East Report 198, 28-31.
  • Arat, Y. (2000). From Emancipation to Liberation: the Changing Role of Women in Turkey’s Public Realm, Journal of International Affairs 54 (1), 107-126.
  • Arat, Y. (2001). Women’s Rights as Human Rights: The Turkish Case, Human Rights Review 3 (1), 27-34.
  • Arat, Y. (2005). Women’s Challenge to Citizenship in Turkey. In F. Birtek & T. Dragonas (Eds.), Citizenship and the Nation-State in Greece and Turkey, (104-116). London and New York: Routledge.
  • Arat, Z. (1998). Educating the Daughters of the Republic. In Z. F. Arat (Ed.), Deconstructing Images of Turkish Woman (175-181). New York: St. Martin’s Press.
  • Atkinson, P. and Coffey, A. (2004). Analysing Documentary Realities. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice (2nd ed.) (56-75). London: Sage.
  • Çaha, Ö. (2010). Sivil Kadın Türkiye’de Kadın ve Sivil Toplum (Genişletilmiş 2. Baskı). Ankara: Savaş Yayınevi.
  • Çakır, S. (1996). Osmanlı Kadın Hareketi. İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.
  • Durakbaşa, A. (1998a). Kemalism as Identity Politics in Turkey. In Z. F. Arat (Ed.), Deconstructing Images of Turkish Woman (139-156). New York: St. Martin’s Press.
  • Durakbaşa, A. (1998b) Cumhuriyet Döneminde Modern Kadın ve Erkek Kimliklerinin Oluşumu: Kemalist Kadın Kimliği ve ‘Münevver Erkekler’. In A. Berktay Hacımirzaoğlu (Ed.), 75. Yılda Kadınlar ve Erkekler (29-51). İstanbul: Türkiye Ekonomik ve Toplumsal Tarih Vakfı.
  • Durakbaşa, A. and İlyasoglu A. (2001). Formation of Gender Identities in Republican Turkey and Women’s Narratives as Transmitters of ‘Herstory’ of Modernization. Journal of Social History 35 (1), 195-203.

Türk Kadını Dergisinde (1966-1974) Kadın Hakları Hakkındaki İki Argüman

Year 2017, Issue: 27, 135 - 152, 29.12.2017
https://doi.org/10.16878/gsuilet.373246

Abstract

Bu makale, 1966 ve 1974 yılları arasında yayınlanmış olan Türk Kadını dergisinde geliştirildiği şekliyle, Türkiye’de kadın hakları ve bu hakların uygulanmaması hakkında iki argüman sunmaktadır. Çalışmamız nicel değil, nitel bir çalışma olup, sadece belli bir söylemin varlığına işaret etmeyi amaçlamaktadır; söz konusu söylemin etkisini ispat etmek çalışmamız kapsamına girmemektedir. Çalışmamızın sonuçları, kadın haklarıyla ilgili daha önce çalışılmamış bazı argümanların varlığını göstererek Türkiye’de kadın çalışmaları alanına katkıda bulunmaktadır; ayrıca çalışma tarihsel medya çalışmalarının daha geniş ampirik kadın çalışmaları alanı için olan değerine işaret etmektedir. Çalışmada söz konusu olan iki argüman sırasıyla, Anadolu kadınlarının eksik kurtuluşu argümanı (IEAWA) ve kurtulmuş ama özgürleşmemiş kadın argümanıdır (EUTWA). Her iki argüman Türk kadınlarının haklarının uygulanmaması hakkında farklı açıklamalara işaret ederken, her ikisi de Anadolu kadınlarının bağlam ve koşullarına odaklanmaktadır.

References

  • Abadan-Unat, N. (1991). The Impact of Legal and Educational Reforms on Turkish Women. In N. R. Keddie and B. Baron (Eds.), Women in Middle Eastern History (177-194). Yale University Press.
  • Arat, Y. (1996). On Gender and Citizenship in Turkey, Middle East Report 198, 28-31.
  • Arat, Y. (2000). From Emancipation to Liberation: the Changing Role of Women in Turkey’s Public Realm, Journal of International Affairs 54 (1), 107-126.
  • Arat, Y. (2001). Women’s Rights as Human Rights: The Turkish Case, Human Rights Review 3 (1), 27-34.
  • Arat, Y. (2005). Women’s Challenge to Citizenship in Turkey. In F. Birtek & T. Dragonas (Eds.), Citizenship and the Nation-State in Greece and Turkey, (104-116). London and New York: Routledge.
  • Arat, Z. (1998). Educating the Daughters of the Republic. In Z. F. Arat (Ed.), Deconstructing Images of Turkish Woman (175-181). New York: St. Martin’s Press.
  • Atkinson, P. and Coffey, A. (2004). Analysing Documentary Realities. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice (2nd ed.) (56-75). London: Sage.
  • Çaha, Ö. (2010). Sivil Kadın Türkiye’de Kadın ve Sivil Toplum (Genişletilmiş 2. Baskı). Ankara: Savaş Yayınevi.
  • Çakır, S. (1996). Osmanlı Kadın Hareketi. İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.
  • Durakbaşa, A. (1998a). Kemalism as Identity Politics in Turkey. In Z. F. Arat (Ed.), Deconstructing Images of Turkish Woman (139-156). New York: St. Martin’s Press.
  • Durakbaşa, A. (1998b) Cumhuriyet Döneminde Modern Kadın ve Erkek Kimliklerinin Oluşumu: Kemalist Kadın Kimliği ve ‘Münevver Erkekler’. In A. Berktay Hacımirzaoğlu (Ed.), 75. Yılda Kadınlar ve Erkekler (29-51). İstanbul: Türkiye Ekonomik ve Toplumsal Tarih Vakfı.
  • Durakbaşa, A. and İlyasoglu A. (2001). Formation of Gender Identities in Republican Turkey and Women’s Narratives as Transmitters of ‘Herstory’ of Modernization. Journal of Social History 35 (1), 195-203.
There are 12 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section Articles
Authors

Fatma Fulya Tepe

Per Bauhn

Publication Date December 29, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2017Issue: 27

Cite

APA Tepe, F. F., & Bauhn, P. (2017). Türk Kadını Dergisinde (1966-1974) Kadın Hakları Hakkındaki İki Argüman. Galatasaray Üniversitesi İletişim Dergisi(27), 135-152. https://doi.org/10.16878/gsuilet.373246

Creative Commons LisansıTRDizinlogo_live-e1586763957746.png