Abstract
The most of the theories on Internet, assume that Internet is a tool of the social change. The present of different identities in Internet seen as the proof of the democratic structure of Internet. The one of the main assumption of his study is that democratic function of Internet can only proof with different contents and different agenda of different identity. The study includes two researches which had been done in different periods. In the first research, the discussion lists of members which are belong to different identities, have been studied. The relation between these lists and dominant discourse has been evaluated. In the second research, the reproduction of the same identity in different social context has been studied. The mean problematic of the study is if Internet has the function of become democratic. Research finding is that Internet make different identities became passer of the dominant discourse.
Keywords
References
- BONCHEK, Mark Seth, (1997) From Broadcast to Netcast: The Internet and the Flow of Political Information, Harvard Universitesi Yayınlanmamıfl Doktora Tezi. DEARING, James W,Rogers Everest M.,(1996) Agenda-Setting, Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE.
- İNAL, Ayfle, (1996) Haberi Okumak, İstanbul: Temuçin Yayınları
- KRESS, Gunther, LEEUWEN, Theo van., (1998) "Front Pages: (The Critical) Analsis of Newspaper Layout", Approaches to MEDIA Discourse, Ed.BELL, Allan- GARRETT, Peter, Oxford: Blackwell PublishersLtd,
- MCLUHAN, Marshall, (1989), The global village : transformations in world life and media in the 21st century, New York : Oxford University Pres.
- MCQUAIL, Denis,(1987) “The Influence and Effects of Mass Media”, Mass Communication and Sosiety, 5.baskı, Ed. James Curran, Michael Gurevitch, Janet Woollacott, London: Open University, ss.70-94.
- SCLOVE, Richard E. (1995), "Making Technology Democratic", Resisting The Virtual Life-The Culture and Politics of Information, ed.James Brook ve Iain A. Boal, Californiya: City lights.
- STEELE, Jane, (1998) "Information and Citizenship in Europe", Cyberspace Divide-Equality, Agency and Policy in the Information Society, ed.Brian D. Loader, New York: Routledge. VAN DIJK, Teun A, (1983) "Discourse Analysis: Its Development and Application to the Structure of News", Journal of Communication, Bahar
- YAfiIN, Cem, (2002) Haber Söyleminin İnternet İçeriklerine Etkisi, Ankara Üniversitesi Yayınlanmamıfl Doktora Tezi.
- YÜKSEL, Erkan, (2001), Medyanın Gündem Belirleme Gücü, Konya: Çizgi Kitabevi
Abstract
La plupart des théories prenant pour objet l'Internet le considèrent comme un moyen de transformation sociale. La presence sur l'Internet des identités différentes est vue, par ces théories, comme une preuve de sa structure démocratique. Une des présupposions centrales de cette étude est que la fonction démocratisante de l'Internet ne peut être prouvée que si les différents ordres du jours et des contenus appartenant a des identités différentes s'y trouvent exprimés. Cette étude se base sur deux recherches faites à deux périodes différentes. La première recherche dont la problématique est d'observer comment les identités différentes se reproduisent dans le discours dominant en perdant ainsi dans ce processus leurs particularités, prend pour objet l'évaluation des listes des discussions auxquelles se trouvent attachées des personnes de divers identités politiques. On y a évalué les liens de ces listes avec le discours dominant. La deuxième recherche essaie de nous montrer comment une seule identité se reconstruit dans des différents contextes sociaux. La problématique principale de cette étude est d'interroger si oui ou non l'Internet possède une fonction démocratisante ? Les résultats obtenus nous pousse a argumenter que ce moyen de communication transforme plutôt les identités différentes en des porteurs du discours dominant.
Keywords
References
- BONCHEK, Mark Seth, (1997) From Broadcast to Netcast: The Internet and the Flow of Political Information, Harvard Universitesi Yayınlanmamıfl Doktora Tezi. DEARING, James W,Rogers Everest M.,(1996) Agenda-Setting, Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE.
- İNAL, Ayfle, (1996) Haberi Okumak, İstanbul: Temuçin Yayınları
- KRESS, Gunther, LEEUWEN, Theo van., (1998) "Front Pages: (The Critical) Analsis of Newspaper Layout", Approaches to MEDIA Discourse, Ed.BELL, Allan- GARRETT, Peter, Oxford: Blackwell PublishersLtd,
- MCLUHAN, Marshall, (1989), The global village : transformations in world life and media in the 21st century, New York : Oxford University Pres.
- MCQUAIL, Denis,(1987) “The Influence and Effects of Mass Media”, Mass Communication and Sosiety, 5.baskı, Ed. James Curran, Michael Gurevitch, Janet Woollacott, London: Open University, ss.70-94.
- SCLOVE, Richard E. (1995), "Making Technology Democratic", Resisting The Virtual Life-The Culture and Politics of Information, ed.James Brook ve Iain A. Boal, Californiya: City lights.
- STEELE, Jane, (1998) "Information and Citizenship in Europe", Cyberspace Divide-Equality, Agency and Policy in the Information Society, ed.Brian D. Loader, New York: Routledge. VAN DIJK, Teun A, (1983) "Discourse Analysis: Its Development and Application to the Structure of News", Journal of Communication, Bahar
- YAfiIN, Cem, (2002) Haber Söyleminin İnternet İçeriklerine Etkisi, Ankara Üniversitesi Yayınlanmamıfl Doktora Tezi.
- YÜKSEL, Erkan, (2001), Medyanın Gündem Belirleme Gücü, Konya: Çizgi Kitabevi
Abstract
İnternet ile ilgili kuramların birçoğu interneti toplumsal dönüşümün bir aracı olarak görmektedir. İnternette farklı kimliklerin bulunması, internetin demokratik yapısının ispatı olarak görülmektedir. Bu çalışmanın temel varsayımlarından biri internetin demokratikleştirici işlevinin ancak farklı kimliklere ait farklı gündem ve içeriklerle ispatlanabileceğidir. Çalışma farklı dönemlerde yapılmış iki araştırmayı içermektedir. ilk araştırmada farklı siyasal kimliklere sahip üyelerden oluşan tartışma listeleri incelenmiştir. Bu listelerin egemen söylem ile ilişkisi değerlendirilmiştir. Araştırmanın konusu farklı kimliklerin kendilerini egemen söylem içinde yeniden üretmesi ve kimlik farklılıklarının ortadan kalkmasıdır. ikinci araştırmada tek bir kimliğin farklı toplumsal bağlamlar içinde kendini yeniden üretmesi değerlendirilmiştir. Araştırmanın temel sorunsalı, internetin demokratikleştirici bir işleve sahip olup olmadığıdır. Araştırma bulguları internetin farklı kimlikleri egemen söylemin aktarıcısı haline getirdiğidir.
Keywords
References
- BONCHEK, Mark Seth, (1997) From Broadcast to Netcast: The Internet and the Flow of Political Information, Harvard Universitesi Yayınlanmamıfl Doktora Tezi. DEARING, James W,Rogers Everest M.,(1996) Agenda-Setting, Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE.
- İNAL, Ayfle, (1996) Haberi Okumak, İstanbul: Temuçin Yayınları
- KRESS, Gunther, LEEUWEN, Theo van., (1998) "Front Pages: (The Critical) Analsis of Newspaper Layout", Approaches to MEDIA Discourse, Ed.BELL, Allan- GARRETT, Peter, Oxford: Blackwell PublishersLtd,
- MCLUHAN, Marshall, (1989), The global village : transformations in world life and media in the 21st century, New York : Oxford University Pres.
- MCQUAIL, Denis,(1987) “The Influence and Effects of Mass Media”, Mass Communication and Sosiety, 5.baskı, Ed. James Curran, Michael Gurevitch, Janet Woollacott, London: Open University, ss.70-94.
- SCLOVE, Richard E. (1995), "Making Technology Democratic", Resisting The Virtual Life-The Culture and Politics of Information, ed.James Brook ve Iain A. Boal, Californiya: City lights.
- STEELE, Jane, (1998) "Information and Citizenship in Europe", Cyberspace Divide-Equality, Agency and Policy in the Information Society, ed.Brian D. Loader, New York: Routledge. VAN DIJK, Teun A, (1983) "Discourse Analysis: Its Development and Application to the Structure of News", Journal of Communication, Bahar
- YAfiIN, Cem, (2002) Haber Söyleminin İnternet İçeriklerine Etkisi, Ankara Üniversitesi Yayınlanmamıfl Doktora Tezi.
- YÜKSEL, Erkan, (2001), Medyanın Gündem Belirleme Gücü, Konya: Çizgi Kitabevi
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Articles |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | February 1, 2006 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2006Issue: 4 |
