Türkiye’de Sinemayı Konu Alan Doktora Tezleri Üzerine Bibliyometrik Bir Çözümleme

Çağrı İnceoğlu

doi:10.16878/gsuilet.96674

Araştırma Makalesi

Une analyse bibliométrique des thèses de doctorat sur le cinéma en Turquie

Yıl 2014, Sayı: 21, 31 - 50, 08.12.2014

Çağrı İnceoğlu

https://doi.org/10.16878/gsuilet.96674

Cited By: 26

Öz

Les thèses des études supérieures représentent des données très importantes dans une recherche universitaire pour déterminer les caractéristiques d’orientations. Dans cette étude, 199 thèses de doctorat réalisées en Turquie entre 1985 et 2013 sur le cinéma ont été traités par l’analyse bibliométrique en fonction des départements disciplines dans lesquels elles ont été réalisées, des sujets de recherche fondamentale, les fondements critiques et théoriques, des types de construction, de la langue de rédaction et des mots-clés. Certains résultats de la recherche démontrent que le nombre de thèses sur le cinéma a augmenté ces dernières années, que l’interdisciplinarité est en hausse, que la perspective sociologique a une grande importance, et que les recherches se concentrent de plus en plus sur le cinéma turc.

Anahtar Kelimeler

bibliométrie, cinéma, recherches sur le cinéma, thèses

Kaynakça

ALTMAN Rick R. (2009), “Whither film studies (in a post-film studies world)?”, Cinema Journal, Sayı: 49(1): 131-135, doi:10.1353/cj.0.0160
ANDREW Dudley (2000),““Three Ages” of Cinema Studies and the Age to Come”, PMLA, Sayı: 115(3): 341-351.
ANDREW Dudley (2009), “The Core and the Flow of Film Studies”, Critical Inquiry, Sayı: 35: 879-915.
EZEMA Ifeanyi J. (2010), “Trends in electronic journal publishing in Africa: An Analysis of African Journal Online (AJOL)”, Webology, Sayı: 7(1), http://www. webology.org/2010/v7n1/a74.html, 20.09.2011
BORGMAN Christine L. ve FURNER, Jonathan (2002), “Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics”, Blaise Cronin (der.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, Medford-NJ, Information Today, s. 3-72.
BORGMAN Christine L. ve RICE, Ronald E. (1992), “The convergence of information science and communication: A bibliometric analysis”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Sayı; 43(6): 397-411.
CORONADO Rogelio A., RIDDLE, Daniel L., WURTZEL, Wendy A. ve GEORGE, Steven Z. (2011), “Bibliometric Analysis of Articles Published from 1980 to 2009 in Physical Therapy”, Journal of the American Physical Therapy Association,Physical Therapy, Sayı: 91(5): 42-655.
ELSAESSER Thomas ve BUCKLAND Warren (2002), Studying Contemporary American film : A Guide to Movie Analysis, London-Arnold-New York, Oxford University Press.
FEELEY Thomas H. (2008), “A Bibliometric Analysis of Communication Journals from 2002 to 2005”, Human Communication Research, Sayı: 35(3): 505-520.
GRIEVESON Lee (2009), “Discipline and Publish: The Birth of Cinematology”, Cinema Journal, Sayı: 49(1): 168-175.
GÜRATA Ahmet (2010), “2000’li Yıllarda Sinemaya Bir Bakış”, Sinecine Sinema Araştırmaları Dergisi, Sayı: 1(1): 131-135.
NARIN Francis (1976), Evaluative Bibliometrics: The Use of Publication and Citation Analysis in The Evaluation of Scientific Activity, New Jersey, Computer Horizons Inc.
OKAY Aydemir ve OKAY Ayla (2008a), “Undergraduate and Graduate Public Relations Education in Turkey: A Quantitative Study of Dissertations Contributions to Public Relations Field (1984-2007)”, Selçuk İletişim, Sayı: 5(2): 5-14.
OKAY Aydemir ve OKAY Ayla (2008b), “MA And Doctoral Public Relations Research in Turkey (1984-2007): A Quantitative Study of Dissertations Contribution to Public Relations Field”, Public Relations Review, Sayı: 34:3123
PASADEOS Yorgo, BERGER, Bruce ve RENFRO, Bruce R. (2010), “Public Relations as a Maturing Discipline: An Update on Research Networks”, Journal Of Public
Relations Research, Sayı: 22(2):136-158, doi:10.1080/10627261003601390
PASADEOS Yorgo (1985), “A Bibliometric Study of Advertising Citations”, Journal of Advertising, Sayı: 14(4): 52-68.
PRITCHARD Alan (1969), “Statistical Bibliography or Bibliometrics?”, Journal of
Documentation, Sayı: 25(4): 348-349. REEVES Byron ve BORGMAN Christine L. (1983), “A Bibliometric Evaluation of Core Journals in Communication Research”, Human Communication Research, Sayı:10(1): 119-136.
ROSS Sheletha (2010), “A Bibliometric Study: An Author Analysis of Library
Quarterly 1993-2003 (Volumes 63-73)”, http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED511568, 02013
TURNER Graeme (1999), Film as Social Practice, New York, Routledge.
UÇAK Nazan Ö. ve AL Umut (2009), “The Differences Among Disciplines in
Scholarly Communication”, Libri, Sayı: 59: 166-179 ÜSDİKEN Bülent ve PASADEOS Yorgo (1995), “Organisational Analysis in North
America and Europe: A Comparison of Co-citation Networks”, Organisation Studies, Sayı: 16(3):503-526. YALÇIN Haydar, (2010), “Milli Folklor Dergisi’nin Bibliyometrik Profili (20072009)”, Milli Folklor, Sayı: 22(25): 205-211.
YILMAZ R. Ayhan ve UZOĞLU S. (2003), “An Analysis of Thesis and Dissertations on Advertising and Public Relations in Turkey”, 1 st International Symposium
Communication in the Millennium: A Dialogue between Turkish and American Scholars, Austin, Texas, USA, Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları No: 1440: 403-415.
Yükseköğretim Kurulu Başkanlığı (2010), “Yükseköğretim Kurumlarında
Hazırlanan Lisansüstü Tezlerin İnternet Üzerinden Derlenmesi Hakkında Kılavuz”, https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezTeslimKilavuz.jsp, 04.07.2013

A Bibliometric Analysis on the Cinema Studies Doctoral Theses in Turkey

Yıl 2014, Sayı: 21, 31 - 50, 08.12.2014

Çağrı İnceoğlu

https://doi.org/10.16878/gsuilet.96674

Cited By: 26

Öz

A Bibliometric Analysis on the Cinema Studies Doctoral Theses in TurkeyPostgraduate theses provide valuable data to ascertain the characteristics and tendencies of research in an academic field. In this research, 199 doctoral theses that have been completed between 1985 and 2013 (Turkey) in cinema studies analysed through a bibliometric method according to a series of specifications such as the number of theses per year, the disciplines which the doctoral study is undertaken, research topics, critical and theoretical bases, examined production types, geographical focus, language, and . The conclusion points that while the quantity of doctoral theses has increased dramatically, sociological approach has gained importance. Moreover, Turkey’s cinema has become a common topic among the doctoral researches.

Anahtar Kelimeler

bibliometrics, cinema, film studies, cinema studies, theses

Kaynakça

ALTMAN Rick R. (2009), “Whither film studies (in a post-film studies world)?”, Cinema Journal, Sayı: 49(1): 131-135, doi:10.1353/cj.0.0160
ANDREW Dudley (2000),““Three Ages” of Cinema Studies and the Age to Come”, PMLA, Sayı: 115(3): 341-351.
ANDREW Dudley (2009), “The Core and the Flow of Film Studies”, Critical Inquiry, Sayı: 35: 879-915.
EZEMA Ifeanyi J. (2010), “Trends in electronic journal publishing in Africa: An Analysis of African Journal Online (AJOL)”, Webology, Sayı: 7(1), http://www. webology.org/2010/v7n1/a74.html, 20.09.2011
BORGMAN Christine L. ve FURNER, Jonathan (2002), “Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics”, Blaise Cronin (der.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, Medford-NJ, Information Today, s. 3-72.
BORGMAN Christine L. ve RICE, Ronald E. (1992), “The convergence of information science and communication: A bibliometric analysis”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Sayı; 43(6): 397-411.
CORONADO Rogelio A., RIDDLE, Daniel L., WURTZEL, Wendy A. ve GEORGE, Steven Z. (2011), “Bibliometric Analysis of Articles Published from 1980 to 2009 in Physical Therapy”, Journal of the American Physical Therapy Association,Physical Therapy, Sayı: 91(5): 42-655.
ELSAESSER Thomas ve BUCKLAND Warren (2002), Studying Contemporary American film : A Guide to Movie Analysis, London-Arnold-New York, Oxford University Press.
FEELEY Thomas H. (2008), “A Bibliometric Analysis of Communication Journals from 2002 to 2005”, Human Communication Research, Sayı: 35(3): 505-520.
GRIEVESON Lee (2009), “Discipline and Publish: The Birth of Cinematology”, Cinema Journal, Sayı: 49(1): 168-175.
GÜRATA Ahmet (2010), “2000’li Yıllarda Sinemaya Bir Bakış”, Sinecine Sinema Araştırmaları Dergisi, Sayı: 1(1): 131-135.
NARIN Francis (1976), Evaluative Bibliometrics: The Use of Publication and Citation Analysis in The Evaluation of Scientific Activity, New Jersey, Computer Horizons Inc.
OKAY Aydemir ve OKAY Ayla (2008a), “Undergraduate and Graduate Public Relations Education in Turkey: A Quantitative Study of Dissertations Contributions to Public Relations Field (1984-2007)”, Selçuk İletişim, Sayı: 5(2): 5-14.
OKAY Aydemir ve OKAY Ayla (2008b), “MA And Doctoral Public Relations Research in Turkey (1984-2007): A Quantitative Study of Dissertations Contribution to Public Relations Field”, Public Relations Review, Sayı: 34:3123
PASADEOS Yorgo, BERGER, Bruce ve RENFRO, Bruce R. (2010), “Public Relations as a Maturing Discipline: An Update on Research Networks”, Journal Of Public
Relations Research, Sayı: 22(2):136-158, doi:10.1080/10627261003601390
PASADEOS Yorgo (1985), “A Bibliometric Study of Advertising Citations”, Journal of Advertising, Sayı: 14(4): 52-68.
PRITCHARD Alan (1969), “Statistical Bibliography or Bibliometrics?”, Journal of
Documentation, Sayı: 25(4): 348-349. REEVES Byron ve BORGMAN Christine L. (1983), “A Bibliometric Evaluation of Core Journals in Communication Research”, Human Communication Research, Sayı:10(1): 119-136.
ROSS Sheletha (2010), “A Bibliometric Study: An Author Analysis of Library
Quarterly 1993-2003 (Volumes 63-73)”, http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED511568, 02013
TURNER Graeme (1999), Film as Social Practice, New York, Routledge.
UÇAK Nazan Ö. ve AL Umut (2009), “The Differences Among Disciplines in
Scholarly Communication”, Libri, Sayı: 59: 166-179 ÜSDİKEN Bülent ve PASADEOS Yorgo (1995), “Organisational Analysis in North
America and Europe: A Comparison of Co-citation Networks”, Organisation Studies, Sayı: 16(3):503-526. YALÇIN Haydar, (2010), “Milli Folklor Dergisi’nin Bibliyometrik Profili (20072009)”, Milli Folklor, Sayı: 22(25): 205-211.
YILMAZ R. Ayhan ve UZOĞLU S. (2003), “An Analysis of Thesis and Dissertations on Advertising and Public Relations in Turkey”, 1 st International Symposium
Communication in the Millennium: A Dialogue between Turkish and American Scholars, Austin, Texas, USA, Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları No: 1440: 403-415.
Yükseköğretim Kurulu Başkanlığı (2010), “Yükseköğretim Kurumlarında
Hazırlanan Lisansüstü Tezlerin İnternet Üzerinden Derlenmesi Hakkında Kılavuz”, https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezTeslimKilavuz.jsp, 04.07.2013

Türkiye’de Sinemayı Konu Alan Doktora Tezleri Üzerine Bibliyometrik Bir Çözümleme

Yıl 2014, Sayı: 21, 31 - 50, 08.12.2014

Çağrı İnceoğlu

https://doi.org/10.16878/gsuilet.96674

Cited By: 26

Öz

Postgraduate theses provide valuable data to ascertain the characteristics and tendencies of research in an academic field. In this research, 199 doctoral theses that have been completed between 1985 and 2013 (Turkey) in cinema studies analysed through a bibliometric method according to a series of specifications such as the number of theses per year, the disciplines which the doctoral study is undertaken, research topics, critical and theoretical bases, examined production types, geographical focus, language, and keywords. The conclusion points that while the quantity of doctoral theses has increased dramatically, sociological approach has gained importance. Moreover, Turkey’s cinema has become a common topic among the doctoral researches.

Anahtar Kelimeler

bibliyometri, sinema, sinema araştırmaları, tezler

Kaynakça

ALTMAN Rick R. (2009), “Whither film studies (in a post-film studies world)?”, Cinema Journal, Sayı: 49(1): 131-135, doi:10.1353/cj.0.0160
ANDREW Dudley (2000),““Three Ages” of Cinema Studies and the Age to Come”, PMLA, Sayı: 115(3): 341-351.
ANDREW Dudley (2009), “The Core and the Flow of Film Studies”, Critical Inquiry, Sayı: 35: 879-915.
EZEMA Ifeanyi J. (2010), “Trends in electronic journal publishing in Africa: An Analysis of African Journal Online (AJOL)”, Webology, Sayı: 7(1), http://www. webology.org/2010/v7n1/a74.html, 20.09.2011
BORGMAN Christine L. ve FURNER, Jonathan (2002), “Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics”, Blaise Cronin (der.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, Medford-NJ, Information Today, s. 3-72.
BORGMAN Christine L. ve RICE, Ronald E. (1992), “The convergence of information science and communication: A bibliometric analysis”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Sayı; 43(6): 397-411.
CORONADO Rogelio A., RIDDLE, Daniel L., WURTZEL, Wendy A. ve GEORGE, Steven Z. (2011), “Bibliometric Analysis of Articles Published from 1980 to 2009 in Physical Therapy”, Journal of the American Physical Therapy Association,Physical Therapy, Sayı: 91(5): 42-655.
ELSAESSER Thomas ve BUCKLAND Warren (2002), Studying Contemporary American film : A Guide to Movie Analysis, London-Arnold-New York, Oxford University Press.
FEELEY Thomas H. (2008), “A Bibliometric Analysis of Communication Journals from 2002 to 2005”, Human Communication Research, Sayı: 35(3): 505-520.
GRIEVESON Lee (2009), “Discipline and Publish: The Birth of Cinematology”, Cinema Journal, Sayı: 49(1): 168-175.
GÜRATA Ahmet (2010), “2000’li Yıllarda Sinemaya Bir Bakış”, Sinecine Sinema Araştırmaları Dergisi, Sayı: 1(1): 131-135.
NARIN Francis (1976), Evaluative Bibliometrics: The Use of Publication and Citation Analysis in The Evaluation of Scientific Activity, New Jersey, Computer Horizons Inc.
OKAY Aydemir ve OKAY Ayla (2008a), “Undergraduate and Graduate Public Relations Education in Turkey: A Quantitative Study of Dissertations Contributions to Public Relations Field (1984-2007)”, Selçuk İletişim, Sayı: 5(2): 5-14.
OKAY Aydemir ve OKAY Ayla (2008b), “MA And Doctoral Public Relations Research in Turkey (1984-2007): A Quantitative Study of Dissertations Contribution to Public Relations Field”, Public Relations Review, Sayı: 34:3123
PASADEOS Yorgo, BERGER, Bruce ve RENFRO, Bruce R. (2010), “Public Relations as a Maturing Discipline: An Update on Research Networks”, Journal Of Public
Relations Research, Sayı: 22(2):136-158, doi:10.1080/10627261003601390
PASADEOS Yorgo (1985), “A Bibliometric Study of Advertising Citations”, Journal of Advertising, Sayı: 14(4): 52-68.
PRITCHARD Alan (1969), “Statistical Bibliography or Bibliometrics?”, Journal of
Documentation, Sayı: 25(4): 348-349. REEVES Byron ve BORGMAN Christine L. (1983), “A Bibliometric Evaluation of Core Journals in Communication Research”, Human Communication Research, Sayı:10(1): 119-136.
ROSS Sheletha (2010), “A Bibliometric Study: An Author Analysis of Library
Quarterly 1993-2003 (Volumes 63-73)”, http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED511568, 02013
TURNER Graeme (1999), Film as Social Practice, New York, Routledge.
UÇAK Nazan Ö. ve AL Umut (2009), “The Differences Among Disciplines in
Scholarly Communication”, Libri, Sayı: 59: 166-179 ÜSDİKEN Bülent ve PASADEOS Yorgo (1995), “Organisational Analysis in North
America and Europe: A Comparison of Co-citation Networks”, Organisation Studies, Sayı: 16(3):503-526. YALÇIN Haydar, (2010), “Milli Folklor Dergisi’nin Bibliyometrik Profili (20072009)”, Milli Folklor, Sayı: 22(25): 205-211.
YILMAZ R. Ayhan ve UZOĞLU S. (2003), “An Analysis of Thesis and Dissertations on Advertising and Public Relations in Turkey”, 1 st International Symposium
Communication in the Millennium: A Dialogue between Turkish and American Scholars, Austin, Texas, USA, Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları No: 1440: 403-415.
Yükseköğretim Kurulu Başkanlığı (2010), “Yükseköğretim Kurumlarında
Hazırlanan Lisansüstü Tezlerin İnternet Üzerinden Derlenmesi Hakkında Kılavuz”, https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezTeslimKilavuz.jsp, 04.07.2013

Toplam 29 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil	Türkçe
Bölüm	Makaleler
Yazarlar	Çağrı İnceoğlu
Yayımlanma Tarihi	8 Aralık 2014
Yayımlandığı Sayı	Yıl 2014Sayı: 21

Kaynak Göster

APA	İnceoğlu, Ç. (2014). Türkiye’de Sinemayı Konu Alan Doktora Tezleri Üzerine Bibliyometrik Bir Çözümleme. Galatasaray Üniversitesi İletişim Dergisi(21), 31-50. https://doi.org/10.16878/gsuilet.96674