Research Article

Collective Memory and National Identity: Questions, Answers and New Questions

Number: 26 June 30, 2017
  • Meral Uğur Çınar
EN FR TR

Collective Memory and National Identity: Questions, Answers and New Questions

Abstract

The article evaluates the current state of the literature on the collective memory-national identity nexus. Pointing at the interaction between state and non-state actors in the formation and reproduction of collective memory and national identity, the article shows both collective memory’s unifying and divisive role. By pointing at the unintended consequences of institutionalized collective memories on citizenship policies and by showing how transnational dynamics affect the collective memory-national identity link, the article invites further research in the field that is comparative, multifaceted, interdisciplinary and nonfunctionalist. By showing collective memory’s effect on institutional design, the article also urges for bodies of literature that have hitherto neglected collective memory to take this phenomenon seriously in their analyses of institutional design. The article also calls for studies that analyze the implications of changing communicative technologies for the link between collective memory and collective forms of identity. 

Keywords

References

  1. Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined Communities. London: Verso.
  2. Art, D. (2006). The Politics of Nazi Past in Germany and Austria. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Assmann, J. (2008). Communicative and Cultural Memory. A. Erll ve A. Nünning (Ed.), Cultural Memory Studies: An International and Interdisciplinary Handbook içinde (109-118). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
  4. Assmann, J. (1992). Das Kulturelle Gedächtnis: Schrift, Erinnerung und Politische Identität in Frühen Hochkulturen. Munich: Verlag C.H. Beck.
  5. Azaryahu M. ve A. Kellerman (1999). Symbolic Places of National History and Revival: A Study in Zionist Mythical Geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 24(1), 109-123.
  6. Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Texas: University of Texas Press.
  7. Bakhtin, M. (1984). Problems of Dostoyevsky’s Poetics. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
  8. Bar-Tal, D. ve G. H. Bennink (2004). The Nature of Reconciliation as an Outcome and as a Process. Y. Bar-Siman- Tov (Ed.), From Conflict Resolution to Reconciliation içinde (11-38). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Meral Uğur Çınar

Publication Date

June 30, 2017

Submission Date

October 8, 2016

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2017 Number: 26

APA
Uğur Çınar, M. (2017). Kolektif Anlatı ve Vatandaşlık Kimliğinin İnşasına Dair Sorular, Cevaplar ve Yeni Sorular. Galatasaray Üniversitesi İletişim Dergisi, 26, 135-156. https://doi.org/10.16878/gsuilet.324208

Cited By

Creative Commons LisansıTRDizinlogo_live-e1586763957746.png