Collective Memory and National Identity: Questions, Answers and New Questions
Abstract
The article evaluates the current state of the literature on the collective memory-national identity nexus. Pointing at the interaction between state and non-state actors in the formation and reproduction of collective memory and national identity, the article shows both collective memory’s unifying and divisive role. By pointing at the unintended consequences of institutionalized collective memories on citizenship policies and by showing how transnational dynamics affect the collective memory-national identity link, the article invites further research in the field that is comparative, multifaceted, interdisciplinary and nonfunctionalist. By showing collective memory’s effect on institutional design, the article also urges for bodies of literature that have hitherto neglected collective memory to take this phenomenon seriously in their analyses of institutional design. The article also calls for studies that analyze the implications of changing communicative technologies for the link between collective memory and collective forms of identity.
Keywords
Kaynakça
- Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined Communities. London: Verso.
- Art, D. (2006). The Politics of Nazi Past in Germany and Austria. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Assmann, J. (2008). Communicative and Cultural Memory. A. Erll ve A. Nünning (Ed.), Cultural Memory Studies: An International and Interdisciplinary Handbook içinde (109-118). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
- Assmann, J. (1992). Das Kulturelle Gedächtnis: Schrift, Erinnerung und Politische Identität in Frühen Hochkulturen. Munich: Verlag C.H. Beck.
- Azaryahu M. ve A. Kellerman (1999). Symbolic Places of National History and Revival: A Study in Zionist Mythical Geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 24(1), 109-123.
- Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Texas: University of Texas Press.
- Bakhtin, M. (1984). Problems of Dostoyevsky’s Poetics. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
- Bar-Tal, D. ve G. H. Bennink (2004). The Nature of Reconciliation as an Outcome and as a Process. Y. Bar-Siman- Tov (Ed.), From Conflict Resolution to Reconciliation içinde (11-38). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
Türkçe
Konular
-
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar
Meral Uğur Çınar
Yayımlanma Tarihi
30 Haziran 2017
Gönderilme Tarihi
8 Ekim 2016
Kabul Tarihi
-
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2017 Sayı: 26
Cited By
Türk Çizgi Romanında Ulusal Kimliğin Temsili ve Bağımsızlık Fikri
Yıldız Journal of Art and Design
https://doi.org/10.47481/yjad.1022307KUR’AN’DA HATIRLATMA UNSURLARI OLARAK MEKÂN, ZAMAN VE OLAYLAR
Journal of Analytic Divinity
https://doi.org/10.46595/jad.1104394National Identity and Historical Memory: Functionality of Historical Memory in the Formation and Development of National Identity
Dynamics in Social Sciences and Humanities
https://doi.org/10.62425/dssh.1494987A Conceptual Evaluation of the Relationship between Memory Space, Memory, and Space
ART/icle: Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.56590/stdarticle.1566906

