Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Spatial Interaction on Social Media: A Review on Students Participated in Exchange Program

Year 2020, Issue: 32, 32 - 59, 27.06.2020

Betül Aydoğan

https://doi.org/10.16878/gsuilet.705305

Abstract

This research aims to reveal what photographic social media with location notification services have brought the spatial interaction of individuals. Photographic social media such as Instagram and Facebook, where visual representations of places and their locations can be shared, are subject to this research instead of applications that allow reporting only visited places. How students who participated in an exchange program benefited from social media before going abroad, and how they revealed their spatial experiences in social media when they went, are the main problems of study. As one of the qualitative research methods, in-depth interviews were conducted with 18 people aged 23 to 30 years. According to the findings, the individual puts subjective experience to the socially generated meanings of place and conveys them in social media applications. While social media seems to be a channel that directs experiences about the spaces, allowing individuals to share location and photographs of the places, they also allow to express their meaningful places, to present their identities through places, and to communicate through space.

Keywords

Spatial interaction photographic social media location notification locative social media applications

References

  • Anastasiadou, C. ve Migas, N. (2016). Individualising the Tourist Brochure: Reconfiguring Tourism Experiences and Transforming the Classic Imagemaker. Mediating the Tourist Experience içinde (123- 139). Londra: Routledge.
  • Appadurai, A. (2001). Globalization. Durham: Duke University Press.
  • Aziz, A. (2010). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri ve Teknikleri. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
  • Barthes, R. (1996) Camera Lucida. (R. Akçakaya, Çev.). İstanbul: Altıkırkbeş Yayınları.
  • Carter, M. J. ve Fuller, C. (2015). Symbolic interactionism. Sociopedia. isa, 1, 1–17.
  • Caton, K. ve Santos, C. A. (2008). Closing The Hermeneutic Circle? Photographic Encounters With The Other. Annals of Tourism Research, 35(1), 7–26.
  • Casey, E. S. (2001). Body, Self and Landscape. P. C. Adams, (Ed.), Textures of Place içinde (s. 403–425). Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press
  • Castells, M. (2005). Enformasyon Çağı, Ekonomi, Toplum ve Kültür 1. Cilt: Ağ Toplumunun Yükselişi. (E. Kılıç, Çev.). İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • Certeau, M. (2008). Gündelik Hayatın Keşfi I. L. (A. Özcan, Çev.). Ankara: Dost Kitabevi.
  • Cresswell, T. (2004). Place: A Short Introduction. Londra: Wiley.
  • Culler, J. (2009). Turizmin Göstergebilimi. Cogito, 59, 95–112.
  • De Souza e Silva, A. (2006). From Cyber To Hybrid: Mobile Technologies As Interfaces Of Hybrid Spaces. Space and Culture, 9(3), 261–278.
  • De Souza e Silva, A. ve Frith, J. (2013) Re-Narrating the City Through the Presentation of Location. J. Farman, (Ed.), The Mobile Story: Narrative Practices with Locative Technologies içinde (s. 34 -50). Londra: Routledge.
  • Despard, E. (2015). Photographic Social Media, Designed Landscapes and Urban, Place based Visibilities: In Search of Friction. Journal of Aesthetics & Culture, 7(1), 28–42.
  • Erdoğan, İ. (2007). Pozitivist Metodoloji. Ankara: Erk Yayınları.
  • Frith, J. (2014). Communicating Through Location: The Understood Meaning of the Foursquare Check‐ In. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 19(4), 890–905.
  • Giddens, A. (1994). Modernliğin Sonuçları. (E. Kuşdil, Çev.). İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
  • Goffman, E. (2014). Günlük Yaşamda Benliğin Sunumu (3. Baskı). (B. Cezar, Çev.). İstanbul: Metis.
  • Gordon, E. ve De Souza e Silva, A. (2011). Net Locality: Why Location Matters in A Networked World. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Göregenli, M. (2015). Çevre Psikolojisi. İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • Haldrup, M. ve Larsen, J. (2003). The Family Gaze. Tourist Studies, 3(1), 23–46.
  • Halegoua, G. R. (2020). The Digital City: Media and the Social Production of Place (Vol. 4). NYU Press.
  • Harvey, D. (1997). Postmodernliğin Durumu. (S. Savran, Çev.). İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.
  • Hjorth, L. ve Pink, S. (2014). New Visualities And The Digital Wayfarer: Reconceptualizing Camera Phone Photography And Locative Media. Mobile Media & Communication, 2(1), 40–57.
  • Hochman, N. ve Manovich, L. (2013). Zooming into an Instagram City: Reading The Local Through Social Media. First Monday, 18(7).
  • Hochman, N., Manovich, L. ve Yazdani, M. (2014). On Hyper-Locality: Performances Of Place In Social Media. In Proceedings of 2014 International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.
  • Jameson, F. (2011). Postmodernizm ya da Geç Kapitalizmin Küresel Mantığı. (N. Plümer, A. Gölcü, Çev.). Ankara: Nirengi Yayıncılık.
  • Jenkins, O. (2003). Photography And Travel Brochures: The Circle Of Representation. Tourism Geographies, 5(3), 305–328.
  • Kaymaz, I. (2013). Urban Landscapes and Identity. Advances Landscape Architecture InTech.
  • Kim, S. ve O’Connor, N. (2016). Media-Related Tourism Phenomena: A Review Of The Key Issues. Mediating the Tourist Experience içinde (13–32). Londra: Routledge.
  • Lapenta, F. (2011). Geomedia: On Location-Based Media, The Changing Status Of Collective Image Production And The Emergence Of Social Navigation Systems. Visual Studies, 26(1), 14–24.
  • Lemos, A. (2010). Post—Mass Media Functions, Locative Media, and Informational Territories: New Ways of Thinking About Territory, Place, And Mobility in Contemporary Society. Space and Culture, 13(4), 403–420.
  • Larsen, J. (2006). Geographies of Tourist Photography. Jansson, A. ve Falkheimer, J. (Ed.), Geographies of Communication: The Spatial Turn in Media Studies içinde (243–260) Gothenburg: Nordicom.
  • Lester, J. A. ve Scarles, C. (Ed.). (2016). Mediating The Tourist Experience: From Brochures To Virtual Encounters. In Mediating the Tourist Experience içinde (1–14). Londra: Routledge.
  • Leszczynski, A. (2014). Spatial Media/tion. Progress in Human Geography, 39(6), 729– 751.
  • Leszczynski, A. ve Elwood, S. (2011). Privacy, Reconsidered: New Representations, Data Practices, and The Geoweb, Geoforum, 42, 1, 6–15.
  • Low, S. M. (2009). Towards An Anthropological Theory of Space and Place. Semiotica, 175, 21–37.
  • Meyrowitz, J. (1986). No Sense of Place: The Impact Of Electronic Media On Social Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Özkul, D. (2014a). Mobile Nodes: Mobile and Locative Media, Everyday Life and Sense Of Place. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Westminster University.
  • Özkul, D. (2014b). Location As A Sense Of Place: Everyday Life, Mobile, And Spatial Practices in Urban Spaces. De Souza e Silva, A. ve Sheller, M. (Ed.). Mobility and Locative Media: Mobile Communication in Hybrid Spaces içinde (101- 116). Londra: Routledge.
  • Poloma, M. (1993). Çağdaş Sosyoloji Kuramları. (H. Erbaş, Çev.). Ankara: Gündoğan Yayınları.
  • Relph, E. (1976). Place and Placelessness. Londra: Pion.
  • Robinson, P. (2016). Developping E-meditazed Gaze. Lester, J. A. ve Scarles, C. (Ed.), Mediating The Tourist Experience içinde (155–170). Londra: Routledge.
  • Salmond, M. (2016): The Mediation and Fetishisation of the Travel Experience. Lester, J. A. ve Scarles, C. (Ed.) Mediating The Tourist Experience içinde (189–208). Londra: Routledge.
  • Schwartz, R. ve Halegoua, G. R. (2015). The spatial self: Location-based identity performance on social media. New media & society, 17(10), 1643–1660.
  • Sontag, S. (2010). Fotoğraf Üzerine. (O. Akınhay, Çev.). İstanbul: Agora Kitaplığı.
  • Thielmann, T. (2010). Locative Media And Mediated Localities. Aether: The Journal Of Media Geography, 5(1), 1–17.
  • Tokgöz-Şahoğlu, C. (2018). Kullanımlar ve Doyumlar Yaklaşımı Çerçevesinde Konum Paylaşım Motivasyonları: Foursquare ve Swarm Üzerine Nitel Bir Araştırma. Galatasaray Üniversitesi İleti-ş-im Dergisi, (29), 257–278.
  • Türkiye Araştırmacılar Derneği (TÜAD) (2012). Sosyo-Ekonomik Statü Ölçeği. Erişim 23 Ocak 2020, https://tuad.org.tr/upload/dosyalar/SES_Projesi.pdf
  • Urbain, D. J. (2009). Yolcu ve İkizi ya da “Sahte” Karmaşası, Cogito, 50, 67–74.
  • Urry, J. (2009). Mekânları Tüketmek. (R. G. Öğdül, Çev.). İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
  • Urry, J., ve Larsen, J. (2011). The Tourist Gaze 3.0. Beverly Hills, California: Sage.
  • Van Dijck, J. (2011). Flickr And The Culture Of Connectivity: Sharing Views, Experiences, Memories. Memory Studies, 4(4), 401–415.
  • Wilken, R. (2014). Places Nearby: Facebook As A Location-Based Social Media Platform. New Media & Society, 16(7), 1087–1103.
  • Withers, C. (2009). Place and the “Spatial Turn” in Geography and in History. Journal of the History of Ideas, 70(4), 637–658. Erişim 07 Mart 2018, http://www.jstor.org/stable/20621915
  • Zimmermann, S. (2007). Media Geographies: Always Part Of The Game. Aether: The Journal of Media Geography, 1, 59–62.

Sosyal Medyada Mekânsal Etkileşim: Değişim Programına Katılmış Öğrenciler Üzerine Bir İnceleme

Year 2020, Issue: 32, 32 - 59, 27.06.2020

Betül Aydoğan

https://doi.org/10.16878/gsuilet.705305

Abstract

Bu çalışmada konum bildirim özelliği olan fotoğrafik sosyal medyaların bireylerin mekânsal etkileşimlerine ne sağladığını ortaya koymak amaçlanmıştır. Çalışmanın konusu, yalnızca ziyaret edilen yerlerin bildirilmesine izin veren uygulamalar yerine Instagram ve Facebook gibi mekânların görsel temsillerinin yer aldığı ve konumlarının bildirilebildiği fotoğrafik sosyal medyalardır. Değişim programına katılmış öğrencilerin, yurtdışına gitmeden önce sosyal medyadan nasıl faydalandıkları, gittiklerinde ise mekânsal tecrübelerini sosyal medyada nasıl aktardıkları, araştırmanın temel sorunsallarıdır. Niteliksel araştırma yöntemlerinden derinlemesine görüşmeden faydalanılarak 23–30 yaş aralığında 18 kişi ile görüşülmüştür. Bulgulara göre birey, mekânlara dair üretilmiş toplumsal anlamlara öznel deneyimini koyarak sosyal medya uygulamalarında aktarmaktadır. Sosyal medya, mekânlara dair deneyimlere yön veren bir mecra gibi görünse de mekân konumlarının ve fotoğraflarının paylaşılmasına imkân tanıyarak bireylerin kendi anlamlı yerlerini anlatmalarını, kimliklerini mekânlar aracılığıyla sunmalarını, mekân üzerinden iletişim kurmalarını sağlamaktadır.

Keywords

Mekansal Etkileşim konum bildirimi konumsal sosyal medya uygulamaları fotoğrafik sosyal medya

References

  • Anastasiadou, C. ve Migas, N. (2016). Individualising the Tourist Brochure: Reconfiguring Tourism Experiences and Transforming the Classic Imagemaker. Mediating the Tourist Experience içinde (123- 139). Londra: Routledge.
  • Appadurai, A. (2001). Globalization. Durham: Duke University Press.
  • Aziz, A. (2010). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri ve Teknikleri. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
  • Barthes, R. (1996) Camera Lucida. (R. Akçakaya, Çev.). İstanbul: Altıkırkbeş Yayınları.
  • Carter, M. J. ve Fuller, C. (2015). Symbolic interactionism. Sociopedia. isa, 1, 1–17.
  • Caton, K. ve Santos, C. A. (2008). Closing The Hermeneutic Circle? Photographic Encounters With The Other. Annals of Tourism Research, 35(1), 7–26.
  • Casey, E. S. (2001). Body, Self and Landscape. P. C. Adams, (Ed.), Textures of Place içinde (s. 403–425). Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press
  • Castells, M. (2005). Enformasyon Çağı, Ekonomi, Toplum ve Kültür 1. Cilt: Ağ Toplumunun Yükselişi. (E. Kılıç, Çev.). İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • Certeau, M. (2008). Gündelik Hayatın Keşfi I. L. (A. Özcan, Çev.). Ankara: Dost Kitabevi.
  • Cresswell, T. (2004). Place: A Short Introduction. Londra: Wiley.
  • Culler, J. (2009). Turizmin Göstergebilimi. Cogito, 59, 95–112.
  • De Souza e Silva, A. (2006). From Cyber To Hybrid: Mobile Technologies As Interfaces Of Hybrid Spaces. Space and Culture, 9(3), 261–278.
  • De Souza e Silva, A. ve Frith, J. (2013) Re-Narrating the City Through the Presentation of Location. J. Farman, (Ed.), The Mobile Story: Narrative Practices with Locative Technologies içinde (s. 34 -50). Londra: Routledge.
  • Despard, E. (2015). Photographic Social Media, Designed Landscapes and Urban, Place based Visibilities: In Search of Friction. Journal of Aesthetics & Culture, 7(1), 28–42.
  • Erdoğan, İ. (2007). Pozitivist Metodoloji. Ankara: Erk Yayınları.
  • Frith, J. (2014). Communicating Through Location: The Understood Meaning of the Foursquare Check‐ In. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 19(4), 890–905.
  • Giddens, A. (1994). Modernliğin Sonuçları. (E. Kuşdil, Çev.). İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
  • Goffman, E. (2014). Günlük Yaşamda Benliğin Sunumu (3. Baskı). (B. Cezar, Çev.). İstanbul: Metis.
  • Gordon, E. ve De Souza e Silva, A. (2011). Net Locality: Why Location Matters in A Networked World. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Göregenli, M. (2015). Çevre Psikolojisi. İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • Haldrup, M. ve Larsen, J. (2003). The Family Gaze. Tourist Studies, 3(1), 23–46.
  • Halegoua, G. R. (2020). The Digital City: Media and the Social Production of Place (Vol. 4). NYU Press.
  • Harvey, D. (1997). Postmodernliğin Durumu. (S. Savran, Çev.). İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.
  • Hjorth, L. ve Pink, S. (2014). New Visualities And The Digital Wayfarer: Reconceptualizing Camera Phone Photography And Locative Media. Mobile Media & Communication, 2(1), 40–57.
  • Hochman, N. ve Manovich, L. (2013). Zooming into an Instagram City: Reading The Local Through Social Media. First Monday, 18(7).
  • Hochman, N., Manovich, L. ve Yazdani, M. (2014). On Hyper-Locality: Performances Of Place In Social Media. In Proceedings of 2014 International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.
  • Jameson, F. (2011). Postmodernizm ya da Geç Kapitalizmin Küresel Mantığı. (N. Plümer, A. Gölcü, Çev.). Ankara: Nirengi Yayıncılık.
  • Jenkins, O. (2003). Photography And Travel Brochures: The Circle Of Representation. Tourism Geographies, 5(3), 305–328.
  • Kaymaz, I. (2013). Urban Landscapes and Identity. Advances Landscape Architecture InTech.
  • Kim, S. ve O’Connor, N. (2016). Media-Related Tourism Phenomena: A Review Of The Key Issues. Mediating the Tourist Experience içinde (13–32). Londra: Routledge.
  • Lapenta, F. (2011). Geomedia: On Location-Based Media, The Changing Status Of Collective Image Production And The Emergence Of Social Navigation Systems. Visual Studies, 26(1), 14–24.
  • Lemos, A. (2010). Post—Mass Media Functions, Locative Media, and Informational Territories: New Ways of Thinking About Territory, Place, And Mobility in Contemporary Society. Space and Culture, 13(4), 403–420.
  • Larsen, J. (2006). Geographies of Tourist Photography. Jansson, A. ve Falkheimer, J. (Ed.), Geographies of Communication: The Spatial Turn in Media Studies içinde (243–260) Gothenburg: Nordicom.
  • Lester, J. A. ve Scarles, C. (Ed.). (2016). Mediating The Tourist Experience: From Brochures To Virtual Encounters. In Mediating the Tourist Experience içinde (1–14). Londra: Routledge.
  • Leszczynski, A. (2014). Spatial Media/tion. Progress in Human Geography, 39(6), 729– 751.
  • Leszczynski, A. ve Elwood, S. (2011). Privacy, Reconsidered: New Representations, Data Practices, and The Geoweb, Geoforum, 42, 1, 6–15.
  • Low, S. M. (2009). Towards An Anthropological Theory of Space and Place. Semiotica, 175, 21–37.
  • Meyrowitz, J. (1986). No Sense of Place: The Impact Of Electronic Media On Social Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Özkul, D. (2014a). Mobile Nodes: Mobile and Locative Media, Everyday Life and Sense Of Place. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Westminster University.
  • Özkul, D. (2014b). Location As A Sense Of Place: Everyday Life, Mobile, And Spatial Practices in Urban Spaces. De Souza e Silva, A. ve Sheller, M. (Ed.). Mobility and Locative Media: Mobile Communication in Hybrid Spaces içinde (101- 116). Londra: Routledge.
  • Poloma, M. (1993). Çağdaş Sosyoloji Kuramları. (H. Erbaş, Çev.). Ankara: Gündoğan Yayınları.
  • Relph, E. (1976). Place and Placelessness. Londra: Pion.
  • Robinson, P. (2016). Developping E-meditazed Gaze. Lester, J. A. ve Scarles, C. (Ed.), Mediating The Tourist Experience içinde (155–170). Londra: Routledge.
  • Salmond, M. (2016): The Mediation and Fetishisation of the Travel Experience. Lester, J. A. ve Scarles, C. (Ed.) Mediating The Tourist Experience içinde (189–208). Londra: Routledge.
  • Schwartz, R. ve Halegoua, G. R. (2015). The spatial self: Location-based identity performance on social media. New media & society, 17(10), 1643–1660.
  • Sontag, S. (2010). Fotoğraf Üzerine. (O. Akınhay, Çev.). İstanbul: Agora Kitaplığı.
  • Thielmann, T. (2010). Locative Media And Mediated Localities. Aether: The Journal Of Media Geography, 5(1), 1–17.
  • Tokgöz-Şahoğlu, C. (2018). Kullanımlar ve Doyumlar Yaklaşımı Çerçevesinde Konum Paylaşım Motivasyonları: Foursquare ve Swarm Üzerine Nitel Bir Araştırma. Galatasaray Üniversitesi İleti-ş-im Dergisi, (29), 257–278.
  • Türkiye Araştırmacılar Derneği (TÜAD) (2012). Sosyo-Ekonomik Statü Ölçeği. Erişim 23 Ocak 2020, https://tuad.org.tr/upload/dosyalar/SES_Projesi.pdf
  • Urbain, D. J. (2009). Yolcu ve İkizi ya da “Sahte” Karmaşası, Cogito, 50, 67–74.
  • Urry, J. (2009). Mekânları Tüketmek. (R. G. Öğdül, Çev.). İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
  • Urry, J., ve Larsen, J. (2011). The Tourist Gaze 3.0. Beverly Hills, California: Sage.
  • Van Dijck, J. (2011). Flickr And The Culture Of Connectivity: Sharing Views, Experiences, Memories. Memory Studies, 4(4), 401–415.
  • Wilken, R. (2014). Places Nearby: Facebook As A Location-Based Social Media Platform. New Media & Society, 16(7), 1087–1103.
  • Withers, C. (2009). Place and the “Spatial Turn” in Geography and in History. Journal of the History of Ideas, 70(4), 637–658. Erişim 07 Mart 2018, http://www.jstor.org/stable/20621915
  • Zimmermann, S. (2007). Media Geographies: Always Part Of The Game. Aether: The Journal of Media Geography, 1, 59–62.

Interaction spatiale dans les médias sociaux: une étude sur les étudiants participant au programme d’échange

Year 2020, Issue: 32, 32 - 59, 27.06.2020

Betül Aydoğan

https://doi.org/10.16878/gsuilet.705305

Abstract

Dans cette recherche, le but est de révéler que les médias sociaux photographiques (photographic social media), tels qu’Instagram et Facebook, qui donnent aux utilisateurs la possibilité d’indiquer leurs positions, leur fournissent en même temps une espace pour interactions spatiales. Au lieu des applications permettant de signaler uniquement les lieux visités, le sujet de recherche est les médias sociaux photographiques où des représentations visuelles des lieux et de leurs locations peuvent être partagés. Les principales problématiques portent sur comment les étudiant/e/s ayant participé à un programme d’échange bénéficient des médias sociaux avant leur départ à l’étranger et comment ils transfèrent leurs expériences spatiales sur les médias sociaux. Parmi les méthodes de recherche qualitatives, la méthodologie de recherche fut des entretiens approfondis menés avec 18 personnes âgées de 23 à 30 ans. Selon les résultats, l’individu apporte une expérience subjective aux significations socialement générées des lieux et les transmet aux médias sociaux. Alors que les médias sociaux semblent être un médium qui dirige les expériences sur les espaces, en permettant aux individus le partage de location et de photographies des lieux, ils leur permettent également d’exprimer leurs lieux significatifs, de présenter leur identité à travers des lieux et de communiquer à travers l’espace.

Keywords

Interaction spatiale médias sociaux photographiques notification de position médias sociaux géolocalisés

References

  • Anastasiadou, C. ve Migas, N. (2016). Individualising the Tourist Brochure: Reconfiguring Tourism Experiences and Transforming the Classic Imagemaker. Mediating the Tourist Experience içinde (123- 139). Londra: Routledge.
  • Appadurai, A. (2001). Globalization. Durham: Duke University Press.
  • Aziz, A. (2010). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri ve Teknikleri. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
  • Barthes, R. (1996) Camera Lucida. (R. Akçakaya, Çev.). İstanbul: Altıkırkbeş Yayınları.
  • Carter, M. J. ve Fuller, C. (2015). Symbolic interactionism. Sociopedia. isa, 1, 1–17.
  • Caton, K. ve Santos, C. A. (2008). Closing The Hermeneutic Circle? Photographic Encounters With The Other. Annals of Tourism Research, 35(1), 7–26.
  • Casey, E. S. (2001). Body, Self and Landscape. P. C. Adams, (Ed.), Textures of Place içinde (s. 403–425). Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press
  • Castells, M. (2005). Enformasyon Çağı, Ekonomi, Toplum ve Kültür 1. Cilt: Ağ Toplumunun Yükselişi. (E. Kılıç, Çev.). İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • Certeau, M. (2008). Gündelik Hayatın Keşfi I. L. (A. Özcan, Çev.). Ankara: Dost Kitabevi.
  • Cresswell, T. (2004). Place: A Short Introduction. Londra: Wiley.
  • Culler, J. (2009). Turizmin Göstergebilimi. Cogito, 59, 95–112.
  • De Souza e Silva, A. (2006). From Cyber To Hybrid: Mobile Technologies As Interfaces Of Hybrid Spaces. Space and Culture, 9(3), 261–278.
  • De Souza e Silva, A. ve Frith, J. (2013) Re-Narrating the City Through the Presentation of Location. J. Farman, (Ed.), The Mobile Story: Narrative Practices with Locative Technologies içinde (s. 34 -50). Londra: Routledge.
  • Despard, E. (2015). Photographic Social Media, Designed Landscapes and Urban, Place based Visibilities: In Search of Friction. Journal of Aesthetics & Culture, 7(1), 28–42.
  • Erdoğan, İ. (2007). Pozitivist Metodoloji. Ankara: Erk Yayınları.
  • Frith, J. (2014). Communicating Through Location: The Understood Meaning of the Foursquare Check‐ In. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 19(4), 890–905.
  • Giddens, A. (1994). Modernliğin Sonuçları. (E. Kuşdil, Çev.). İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
  • Goffman, E. (2014). Günlük Yaşamda Benliğin Sunumu (3. Baskı). (B. Cezar, Çev.). İstanbul: Metis.
  • Gordon, E. ve De Souza e Silva, A. (2011). Net Locality: Why Location Matters in A Networked World. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Göregenli, M. (2015). Çevre Psikolojisi. İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • Haldrup, M. ve Larsen, J. (2003). The Family Gaze. Tourist Studies, 3(1), 23–46.
  • Halegoua, G. R. (2020). The Digital City: Media and the Social Production of Place (Vol. 4). NYU Press.
  • Harvey, D. (1997). Postmodernliğin Durumu. (S. Savran, Çev.). İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.
  • Hjorth, L. ve Pink, S. (2014). New Visualities And The Digital Wayfarer: Reconceptualizing Camera Phone Photography And Locative Media. Mobile Media & Communication, 2(1), 40–57.
  • Hochman, N. ve Manovich, L. (2013). Zooming into an Instagram City: Reading The Local Through Social Media. First Monday, 18(7).
  • Hochman, N., Manovich, L. ve Yazdani, M. (2014). On Hyper-Locality: Performances Of Place In Social Media. In Proceedings of 2014 International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.
  • Jameson, F. (2011). Postmodernizm ya da Geç Kapitalizmin Küresel Mantığı. (N. Plümer, A. Gölcü, Çev.). Ankara: Nirengi Yayıncılık.
  • Jenkins, O. (2003). Photography And Travel Brochures: The Circle Of Representation. Tourism Geographies, 5(3), 305–328.
  • Kaymaz, I. (2013). Urban Landscapes and Identity. Advances Landscape Architecture InTech.
  • Kim, S. ve O’Connor, N. (2016). Media-Related Tourism Phenomena: A Review Of The Key Issues. Mediating the Tourist Experience içinde (13–32). Londra: Routledge.
  • Lapenta, F. (2011). Geomedia: On Location-Based Media, The Changing Status Of Collective Image Production And The Emergence Of Social Navigation Systems. Visual Studies, 26(1), 14–24.
  • Lemos, A. (2010). Post—Mass Media Functions, Locative Media, and Informational Territories: New Ways of Thinking About Territory, Place, And Mobility in Contemporary Society. Space and Culture, 13(4), 403–420.
  • Larsen, J. (2006). Geographies of Tourist Photography. Jansson, A. ve Falkheimer, J. (Ed.), Geographies of Communication: The Spatial Turn in Media Studies içinde (243–260) Gothenburg: Nordicom.
  • Lester, J. A. ve Scarles, C. (Ed.). (2016). Mediating The Tourist Experience: From Brochures To Virtual Encounters. In Mediating the Tourist Experience içinde (1–14). Londra: Routledge.
  • Leszczynski, A. (2014). Spatial Media/tion. Progress in Human Geography, 39(6), 729– 751.
  • Leszczynski, A. ve Elwood, S. (2011). Privacy, Reconsidered: New Representations, Data Practices, and The Geoweb, Geoforum, 42, 1, 6–15.
  • Low, S. M. (2009). Towards An Anthropological Theory of Space and Place. Semiotica, 175, 21–37.
  • Meyrowitz, J. (1986). No Sense of Place: The Impact Of Electronic Media On Social Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Özkul, D. (2014a). Mobile Nodes: Mobile and Locative Media, Everyday Life and Sense Of Place. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Westminster University.
  • Özkul, D. (2014b). Location As A Sense Of Place: Everyday Life, Mobile, And Spatial Practices in Urban Spaces. De Souza e Silva, A. ve Sheller, M. (Ed.). Mobility and Locative Media: Mobile Communication in Hybrid Spaces içinde (101- 116). Londra: Routledge.
  • Poloma, M. (1993). Çağdaş Sosyoloji Kuramları. (H. Erbaş, Çev.). Ankara: Gündoğan Yayınları.
  • Relph, E. (1976). Place and Placelessness. Londra: Pion.
  • Robinson, P. (2016). Developping E-meditazed Gaze. Lester, J. A. ve Scarles, C. (Ed.), Mediating The Tourist Experience içinde (155–170). Londra: Routledge.
  • Salmond, M. (2016): The Mediation and Fetishisation of the Travel Experience. Lester, J. A. ve Scarles, C. (Ed.) Mediating The Tourist Experience içinde (189–208). Londra: Routledge.
  • Schwartz, R. ve Halegoua, G. R. (2015). The spatial self: Location-based identity performance on social media. New media & society, 17(10), 1643–1660.
  • Sontag, S. (2010). Fotoğraf Üzerine. (O. Akınhay, Çev.). İstanbul: Agora Kitaplığı.
  • Thielmann, T. (2010). Locative Media And Mediated Localities. Aether: The Journal Of Media Geography, 5(1), 1–17.
  • Tokgöz-Şahoğlu, C. (2018). Kullanımlar ve Doyumlar Yaklaşımı Çerçevesinde Konum Paylaşım Motivasyonları: Foursquare ve Swarm Üzerine Nitel Bir Araştırma. Galatasaray Üniversitesi İleti-ş-im Dergisi, (29), 257–278.
  • Türkiye Araştırmacılar Derneği (TÜAD) (2012). Sosyo-Ekonomik Statü Ölçeği. Erişim 23 Ocak 2020, https://tuad.org.tr/upload/dosyalar/SES_Projesi.pdf
  • Urbain, D. J. (2009). Yolcu ve İkizi ya da “Sahte” Karmaşası, Cogito, 50, 67–74.
  • Urry, J. (2009). Mekânları Tüketmek. (R. G. Öğdül, Çev.). İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
  • Urry, J., ve Larsen, J. (2011). The Tourist Gaze 3.0. Beverly Hills, California: Sage.
  • Van Dijck, J. (2011). Flickr And The Culture Of Connectivity: Sharing Views, Experiences, Memories. Memory Studies, 4(4), 401–415.
  • Wilken, R. (2014). Places Nearby: Facebook As A Location-Based Social Media Platform. New Media & Society, 16(7), 1087–1103.
  • Withers, C. (2009). Place and the “Spatial Turn” in Geography and in History. Journal of the History of Ideas, 70(4), 637–658. Erişim 07 Mart 2018, http://www.jstor.org/stable/20621915
  • Zimmermann, S. (2007). Media Geographies: Always Part Of The Game. Aether: The Journal of Media Geography, 1, 59–62.
There are 56 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Betül Aydoğan 0000-0002-2618-4683

Publication Date June 27, 2020
Acceptance Date May 29, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020Issue: 32

Cite

APA Aydoğan, B. (2020). Sosyal Medyada Mekânsal Etkileşim: Değişim Programına Katılmış Öğrenciler Üzerine Bir İnceleme. Galatasaray Üniversitesi İletişim Dergisi(32), 32-59. https://doi.org/10.16878/gsuilet.705305
 Download Cover Image

Creative Commons LisansıTRDizinlogo_live-e1586763957746.png